* [PATCH] vNUMA: fix build on ARM after commit 9695014966
@ 2014-09-05 11:44 Jan Beulich
2014-09-05 12:04 ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-05 12:05 ` Andrew Cooper
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-09-05 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: Ian Campbell, Keir Fraser, Ian Jackson, ufimtseva, Tim Deegan
The new domctl isn't really x86-specific.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
--- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
@@ -935,6 +935,7 @@
};
typedef struct xen_domctl_vcpu_msrs xen_domctl_vcpu_msrs_t;
DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_domctl_vcpu_msrs_t);
+#endif
/*
* Use in XEN_DOMCTL_setvnumainfo to set
@@ -962,8 +963,6 @@
};
typedef struct xen_domctl_vnuma xen_domctl_vnuma_t;
DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_domctl_vnuma_t);
-
-#endif
struct xen_domctl {
uint32_t cmd;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] vNUMA: fix build on ARM after commit 9695014966
2014-09-05 11:44 [PATCH] vNUMA: fix build on ARM after commit 9695014966 Jan Beulich
@ 2014-09-05 12:04 ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-05 12:05 ` Andrew Cooper
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-09-05 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel, Keir Fraser, Ian Jackson, ufimtseva, Tim Deegan
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 12:44 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The new domctl isn't really x86-specific.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Tested-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Thanks!
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] vNUMA: fix build on ARM after commit 9695014966
2014-09-05 11:44 [PATCH] vNUMA: fix build on ARM after commit 9695014966 Jan Beulich
2014-09-05 12:04 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-09-05 12:05 ` Andrew Cooper
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2014-09-05 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich, xen-devel
Cc: Ian Campbell, Ian Jackson, Keir Fraser, ufimtseva, Tim Deegan
On 05/09/14 12:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The new domctl isn't really x86-specific.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>
> --- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
> @@ -935,6 +935,7 @@
> };
> typedef struct xen_domctl_vcpu_msrs xen_domctl_vcpu_msrs_t;
> DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_domctl_vcpu_msrs_t);
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * Use in XEN_DOMCTL_setvnumainfo to set
> @@ -962,8 +963,6 @@
> };
> typedef struct xen_domctl_vnuma xen_domctl_vnuma_t;
> DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(xen_domctl_vnuma_t);
> -
> -#endif
>
> struct xen_domctl {
> uint32_t cmd;
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-05 12:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-05 11:44 [PATCH] vNUMA: fix build on ARM after commit 9695014966 Jan Beulich
2014-09-05 12:04 ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-05 12:05 ` Andrew Cooper
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).