From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/15] xen/arm: Data abort exception (R/W) mem_events. Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 13:41:58 -0700 Message-ID: <540E1496.5040902@linaro.org> References: <1409581329-2607-1-git-send-email-tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> <1409581329-2607-11-git-send-email-tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> <5404E02E.7010406@linaro.org> <540777F9.8020006@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Tamas K Lengyel Cc: Ian Campbell , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Stefano Stabellini , Andres Lagar-Cavilla , Jan Beulich , Daniel De Graaf , Tamas K Lengyel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/09/14 14:56, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > I'm not entirely sure I could easily extend > apply_one_level/apply_p2m_changes without significant changes and a > potential to affect something else along the way.. I can give it a try > though but I'm a bit hesitant.. Do you see an immediate performance > reason to try to hook it into those functions instead of keeping it > separate? The current function is pretty straight forward in what it is > doing as it is. I would like to avoid standalone function that manipulate the p2m. It will be easier to fix bug, hence the code if everything is using the same code. Regards, -- Julien Grall