From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"JBeulich@suse.com" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
"ian.campbell@citrix.com" <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
"ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com" <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
"stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com"
<stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
"Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [v6][PATCH 0/7] xen: reserve RMRR to avoid conflicting MMIO/RAM
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 09:38:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5410FD10.1020603@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D12607C2D4@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 2014/9/11 5:44, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Chen, Tiejun
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 10:50 PM
>>
>
> currently the confliction is detected absolutely. Do we need a way to allow
> the confliction if there is no device assigned at all?
How to handle a hot-plug case when guest already boot? I think it may
not be worth distinguishing such fine gain, things will be becoming
complicated.
Thanks
Tiejun
>
>> v6:
>>
>> * Jan cleanup to regenerate one patch to replace the two original patches
>> then rebase the others.
>> * Refine all patches short/long logs.
>> * Replace those info with 'reserved device memory maps' and s/RMRR/RDM.
>> * Fix some code styles.
>> * Fix one interation error when we grab e820 info
>> This is not valid when j == nr - 1 (last iteration).
>> * Cleanup some codes.
>> * One comment to introduce a new field, nr_reserved_device_memory_map
>> libxc/hvm_info_table, is still pending to wait the tools maintainer's
>> further comment.
>>
>> v5:
>>
>> * Add patch #2 to introduce a global count, acpi_rmrr_unit_entries.
>> * Refine hypercall return value to make sure the caller can distinguish
>> clearly between "xen filled in N entries" and "xen said you need N
>> entries for all information".
>> * Refine some structures
>> * Then Rebase
>>
>> v4:
>>
>> * Drop the original patch #1. Instead, we use acpi_rmrr_units to get
>> rmrr info directly.
>> * Refine the hypercall definition to make sure we can use it safely.
>> * Introduce introduce nr_reserved_device_memory_map in hvm_info_table,
>> then we can avoid issue unnecessary hypercall, even we can know
>> current RMRR entries to issue hypercall one time.
>> * Cleanup and rebase
>>
>> v3:
>>
>> * Use XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map to replace
>> XENMEM_RMRR_memory_map
>> * Then rebase all patches
>>
>> v2:
>>
>> * Don't use e820map to define RMRR maps directly to avoid any confusion.
>> * In patch #3 we introduce construct_rmrr_e820_maps() to check if we can
>> insert RMRR maps and then we will sort all e820 entries.
>> * Clean patch #4
>> * In patch #5 we reuse check_mmio_hole() to check if current mmio range is
>> fine to RMRR maps. If not, we just issue error to notify the user since
>> mostly mmio should be configured again.
>>
>> While we work for supporting RMRR mapping for Windows GFX driver in case
>> shared table,
>>
>> http://osdir.com/ml/general/2014-07/msg55347.html
>> http://osdir.com/ml/general/2014-07/msg55348.html
>>
>> we realize we should reserve RMRR range to avoid any potential MMIO/RAM
>> overlap with our discussion so here these preliminary patches are intended
>> to cover this.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Jan Beulich (1):
>> introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map
>>
>> Tiejun Chen (6):
>> tools/libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map
>> tools/libxc: check if mmio BAR is out of reserved device memory maps
>> libxc/hvm_info_table: introduce a new field
>> nr_reserved_device_memory_map
>> hvmloader: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map
>> hvmloader: check to reserved device memory maps in e820
>> xen/vtd: make USB RMRR mapping safe
>>
>> tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c | 100
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h | 3 +++
>> tools/libxc/xc_domain.c | 29
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tools/libxc/xc_hvm_build_x86.c | 82
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> ++++++++++++++++--
>> tools/libxc/xenctrl.h | 4 ++++
>> xen/common/compat/memory.c | 52
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> xen/common/memory.c | 49
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/extern.h | 1 +
>> xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c | 9 +--------
>> xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_info_table.h | 3 +++
>> xen/include/public/memory.h | 24
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 4 ++++
>> xen/include/xlat.lst | 3 ++-
>> 16 files changed, 400 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tiejun
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-11 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-10 5:49 [v6][PATCH 0/7] xen: reserve RMRR to avoid conflicting MMIO/RAM Tiejun Chen
2014-09-10 5:49 ` [v6][PATCH 1/7] introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-10 21:34 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-10 5:49 ` [v6][PATCH 2/7] tools/libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-11 15:21 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-11 15:23 ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-11 15:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-12 2:43 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-12 6:20 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-10 5:49 ` [v6][PATCH 3/7] tools/libxc: check if mmio BAR is out of reserved device memory maps Tiejun Chen
2014-09-10 21:37 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-11 1:14 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-11 22:55 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-11 15:38 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-12 2:56 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-12 6:19 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-10 5:49 ` [v6][PATCH 4/7] libxc/hvm_info_table: introduce a new field nr_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-10 21:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-11 1:16 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-10 5:49 ` [v6][PATCH 5/7] hvmloader: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-09-10 21:41 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-11 1:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-11 7:52 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-11 15:45 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-12 4:52 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-10 5:49 ` [v6][PATCH 6/7] hvmloader: check to reserved device memory maps in e820 Tiejun Chen
2014-09-11 15:57 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-12 6:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-12 6:28 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-12 6:44 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-10 5:49 ` [v6][PATCH 7/7] xen/vtd: make USB RMRR mapping safe Tiejun Chen
2014-09-18 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-10 21:44 ` [v6][PATCH 0/7] xen: reserve RMRR to avoid conflicting MMIO/RAM Tian, Kevin
2014-09-11 1:38 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-09-11 7:48 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-11 9:39 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-09-11 10:01 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5410FD10.1020603@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).