Re: [v6][PATCH 2/2] xen:vtd: missing RMRR mapping while share EPT

["Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>]

On 2014/9/3 17:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 03.09.14 at 11:41, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Additionally, I want to know if patch v6 is fine to be acked.
>>>
>>> My position hasn't changed: I view this as correct but incomplete,
>>> and hence not ready for inclusion. With - iirc - Tim being of a
>>> different opinion, if you want to push for a decision without
>>> supplying the missing pieces, see the section "Conflict Resolution"
>>> on http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html. But of course
>>> I'd much prefer to avoid having to fall back to this, and instead
>>> have a complete patch set to commit within reasonable time.
>>
>> Looks I can't make my RFC patches to implement a complete RMRR
>> supporting better as you pointed while reviewing, so I have to go back
>> looking at this.
>
> Please just give me a little time to hand you a replacement patch on
> which you could then base the rest of your series. But please also
> realize that this isn't my top priority.
>
> Jan
>
>> So how can I issue such a private vote on these two patches? I don't see
>> How-to in the section "Conflict Resolution" on
>> http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html.
>>

Jan,

I have to admit its really hard to push this RMRR RFC with my 
experiences and skills. Currently every new revision doesn't minimize 
all previous comments. Instead, it always brings more comments or 
arguments. So I don't think myself can do this very well in Xen side.

So I still hope we can issue such a vote on these two patches if possible.

Once I have enough capability to cover this I can go back or other guys 
may do really better than me.

Thanks
Tiejun