xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86: make dump_pageframe_info() slightly more verbose for dying domains
@ 2014-09-12 13:00 Jan Beulich
  2014-09-22 10:31 ` Andrew Cooper
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-09-12 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel; +Cc: Keir Fraser

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1434 bytes --]

Allowing more than just 10 pages to be printed in this case gives a
better chance to fully understand eventual page reference leaks.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
@@ -151,15 +151,30 @@ void dump_pageframe_info(struct domain *
 
     printk("Memory pages belonging to domain %u:\n", d->domain_id);
 
-    if ( d->tot_pages >= 10 )
+    if ( d->tot_pages >= 10 && d->is_dying < DOMDYING_dead )
     {
         printk("    DomPage list too long to display\n");
     }
     else
     {
+        unsigned long total[PGT_type_mask
+                            / (PGT_type_mask & -PGT_type_mask) + 1] = {};
+
         spin_lock(&d->page_alloc_lock);
         page_list_for_each ( page, &d->page_list )
         {
+            unsigned int index = (page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_type_mask)
+                                 / (PGT_type_mask & -PGT_type_mask);
+
+            if ( ++total[index] > 16 )
+            {
+                switch ( page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_type_mask )
+                {
+                case PGT_none:
+                case PGT_writable_page:
+                    continue;
+                }
+            }
             printk("    DomPage %p: caf=%08lx, taf=%" PRtype_info "\n",
                    _p(page_to_mfn(page)),
                    page->count_info, page->u.inuse.type_info);




[-- Attachment #2: x86-dom-print.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1503 bytes --]

x86: make dump_pageframe_info() slightly more verbose for dying domains

Allowing more than just 10 pages to be printed in this case gives a
better chance to fully understand eventual page reference leaks.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
@@ -151,15 +151,30 @@ void dump_pageframe_info(struct domain *
 
     printk("Memory pages belonging to domain %u:\n", d->domain_id);
 
-    if ( d->tot_pages >= 10 )
+    if ( d->tot_pages >= 10 && d->is_dying < DOMDYING_dead )
     {
         printk("    DomPage list too long to display\n");
     }
     else
     {
+        unsigned long total[PGT_type_mask
+                            / (PGT_type_mask & -PGT_type_mask) + 1] = {};
+
         spin_lock(&d->page_alloc_lock);
         page_list_for_each ( page, &d->page_list )
         {
+            unsigned int index = (page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_type_mask)
+                                 / (PGT_type_mask & -PGT_type_mask);
+
+            if ( ++total[index] > 16 )
+            {
+                switch ( page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_type_mask )
+                {
+                case PGT_none:
+                case PGT_writable_page:
+                    continue;
+                }
+            }
             printk("    DomPage %p: caf=%08lx, taf=%" PRtype_info "\n",
                    _p(page_to_mfn(page)),
                    page->count_info, page->u.inuse.type_info);

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86: make dump_pageframe_info() slightly more verbose for dying domains
  2014-09-12 13:00 [PATCH] x86: make dump_pageframe_info() slightly more verbose for dying domains Jan Beulich
@ 2014-09-22 10:31 ` Andrew Cooper
  2014-09-22 10:46   ` Jan Beulich
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2014-09-22 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich, xen-devel; +Cc: Keir Fraser

On 12/09/14 14:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Allowing more than just 10 pages to be printed in this case gives a
> better chance to fully understand eventual page reference leaks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -151,15 +151,30 @@ void dump_pageframe_info(struct domain *
>  
>      printk("Memory pages belonging to domain %u:\n", d->domain_id);
>  
> -    if ( d->tot_pages >= 10 )
> +    if ( d->tot_pages >= 10 && d->is_dying < DOMDYING_dead )
>      {
>          printk("    DomPage list too long to display\n");
>      }
>      else
>      {
> +        unsigned long total[PGT_type_mask
> +                            / (PGT_type_mask & -PGT_type_mask) + 1] = {};

Is it possible to make use of something like:

#define LSB(x) ((x) & -(x))

for code clarity? (and perhaps for those whose bit manipulation
knowledge is a tad rusty)

Furthermore, the divide needs brackets per Xen style.  The current
layout makes it easy to mistake the +1 as being part of the divisor.

> +
>          spin_lock(&d->page_alloc_lock);
>          page_list_for_each ( page, &d->page_list )
>          {
> +            unsigned int index = (page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_type_mask)
> +                                 / (PGT_type_mask & -PGT_type_mask);
> +
> +            if ( ++total[index] > 16 )
> +            {
> +                switch ( page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_type_mask )
> +                {
> +                case PGT_none:
> +                case PGT_writable_page:
> +                    continue;
> +                }
> +            }

So, the new behaviour is to print all non none or writable_page, and
print the first 16 of each of those?  This is probably fine for
dying/dead domains only, but I feel it warrants a comment in the patch
description.

~Andrew

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86: make dump_pageframe_info() slightly more verbose for dying domains
  2014-09-22 10:31 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2014-09-22 10:46   ` Jan Beulich
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-09-22 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Cooper; +Cc: xen-devel, Keir Fraser

>>> On 22.09.14 at 12:31, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> On 12/09/14 14:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Allowing more than just 10 pages to be printed in this case gives a
>> better chance to fully understand eventual page reference leaks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
>> @@ -151,15 +151,30 @@ void dump_pageframe_info(struct domain *
>>  
>>      printk("Memory pages belonging to domain %u:\n", d->domain_id);
>>  
>> -    if ( d->tot_pages >= 10 )
>> +    if ( d->tot_pages >= 10 && d->is_dying < DOMDYING_dead )
>>      {
>>          printk("    DomPage list too long to display\n");
>>      }
>>      else
>>      {
>> +        unsigned long total[PGT_type_mask
>> +                            / (PGT_type_mask & -PGT_type_mask) + 1] = {};
> 
> Is it possible to make use of something like:
> 
> #define LSB(x) ((x) & -(x))
> 
> for code clarity? (and perhaps for those whose bit manipulation
> knowledge is a tad rusty)

Actually I should make use of MASK_EXTR() here. It's just that the
patch here significantly pre-dates the introduction of that and
MASK_INSR().

> Furthermore, the divide needs brackets per Xen style.  The current
> layout makes it easy to mistake the +1 as being part of the divisor.

I don't think so - the C and mathematical meanings agree here.

>> +
>>          spin_lock(&d->page_alloc_lock);
>>          page_list_for_each ( page, &d->page_list )
>>          {
>> +            unsigned int index = (page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_type_mask)
>> +                                 / (PGT_type_mask & -PGT_type_mask);
>> +
>> +            if ( ++total[index] > 16 )
>> +            {
>> +                switch ( page->u.inuse.type_info & PGT_type_mask )
>> +                {
>> +                case PGT_none:
>> +                case PGT_writable_page:
>> +                    continue;
>> +                }
>> +            }
> 
> So, the new behaviour is to print all non none or writable_page, and
> print the first 16 of each of those?  This is probably fine for
> dying/dead domains only, but I feel it warrants a comment in the patch
> description.

Yeah, could do so. I actually further wonder whether the two
thresholds shouldn't become command line controllable (and
possibly get folded into one).

Jan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-22 10:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-12 13:00 [PATCH] x86: make dump_pageframe_info() slightly more verbose for dying domains Jan Beulich
2014-09-22 10:31 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-22 10:46   ` Jan Beulich

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).