From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/emulate: Support for emulating software event injection
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:04:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5422C15D.7030003@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5422C0AE.3090404@oracle.com>
On 24/09/14 14:01, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 09/23/2014 11:03 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> AMD SVM requires all software events to have their injection emulated if
>> hardware lacks NextRIP support. In addition, `icebp` (opcode 0xf1)
>> injection
>> requires emulation in all cases, even with hardware NextRIP support.
>>
>> Emulating full control transfers is overkill for our needs. All that
>> matters
>> is that guest userspace can't bypass the descriptor DPL check. Any
>> guest OS
>> which would incur other faults as part of injection is going to end
>> up with a
>> double fault instead, and won't be in a position to care that the
>> faulting eip
>> is wrong.
>>
>> Reported-by: Andrei LUTAS <vlutas@bitdefender.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>> CC: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>> CC: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>> CC: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
>> ---
>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c | 8 +++
>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c | 57 +++++++++++++--
>> xen/arch/x86/mm.c | 2 +
>> xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c | 1 +
>> xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c | 122
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h | 10 +++
>> 6 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> index 7ee146b..463ccfb 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>> #include <asm/hvm/hvm.h>
>> #include <asm/hvm/trace.h>
>> #include <asm/hvm/support.h>
>> +#include <asm/hvm/svm/svm.h>
>> static void hvmtrace_io_assist(int is_mmio, ioreq_t *p)
>> {
>> @@ -1328,6 +1329,13 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct
>> hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt,
>> vio->mmio_retrying = vio->mmio_retry;
>> vio->mmio_retry = 0;
>> + if ( cpu_has_vmx )
>> + hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt.swint_emulate = x86_swint_emulate_none;
>> + else if ( cpu_has_svm_nrips )
>> + hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt.swint_emulate = x86_swint_emulate_icebp;
>> + else
>> + hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt.swint_emulate = x86_swint_emulate_all;
>> +
>> rc = x86_emulate(&hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt, ops);
>> if ( rc == X86EMUL_OKAY && vio->mmio_retry )
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
>> index de982fd..b6beefc 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
>> @@ -1177,11 +1177,12 @@ static void svm_inject_trap(struct hvm_trap
>> *trap)
>> struct vmcb_struct *vmcb = curr->arch.hvm_svm.vmcb;
>> eventinj_t event = vmcb->eventinj;
>> struct hvm_trap _trap = *trap;
>> + const struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs();
>> switch ( _trap.vector )
>> {
>> case TRAP_debug:
>> - if ( guest_cpu_user_regs()->eflags & X86_EFLAGS_TF )
>> + if ( regs->eflags & X86_EFLAGS_TF )
>> {
>> __restore_debug_registers(vmcb, curr);
>> vmcb_set_dr6(vmcb, vmcb_get_dr6(vmcb) | 0x4000);
>> @@ -1209,10 +1210,58 @@ static void svm_inject_trap(struct hvm_trap
>> *trap)
>> event.bytes = 0;
>> event.fields.v = 1;
>> - event.fields.type = X86_EVENTTYPE_HW_EXCEPTION;
>> event.fields.vector = _trap.vector;
>> - event.fields.ev = (_trap.error_code != HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE);
>> - event.fields.errorcode = _trap.error_code;
>> +
>> + /* Refer to AMD Vol 2: System Programming, 15.20 Event
>> Injection. */
>> + switch ( _trap.type )
>> + {
>> + case X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_INTERRUPT: /* int $n */
>> + /*
>> + * Injection type 4 (software interrupt) is only supported with
>> + * NextRIP support. Without NextRIP, the emulator will have
>> performed
>> + * DPL and presence checks for us.
>> + */
>> + if ( cpu_has_svm_nrips )
>> + {
>> + vmcb->nextrip = regs->eip + _trap.insn_len;
>> + event.fields.type = X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_INTERRUPT;
>> + }
>> + else
>> + event.fields.type = X86_EVENTTYPE_HW_EXCEPTION;
>> + break;
>> +
>> + case X86_EVENTTYPE_PRI_SW_EXCEPTION: /* icebp */
>> + /*
>> + * icebp's injection must always be emulated. Software
>> injection help
>> + * in x86_emulate has moved eip forward, but NextRIP (if
>> used) still
>> + * needs setting or execution will resume from 0.
>> + */
>
>
> Can you tell me where eip is updated? I don't see any difference
> between how, for example, int3 is emulated differently from icebp.
>
> -boris
The second hunk in this series, chooses between x86_swint_emulate_icebp
and x86_swint_emulate_all based on NRIP support.
This cause inject_swint() to either emulate the injection or not.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-24 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-23 15:03 [PATCH 0/6] HVM Emulation and trap injection fixes Andrew Cooper
2014-09-23 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86emul: fix SYSCALL/SYSENTER/SYSEXIT emulation Andrew Cooper
2014-09-23 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/emulate: Provide further information about software events Andrew Cooper
2014-09-23 15:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/hvm: Don't discard the SW/HW event distinction from the emulator Andrew Cooper
2014-09-25 20:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-26 20:12 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 15:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/emulate: Support for emulating software event injection Andrew Cooper
2014-09-23 22:24 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2014-09-24 9:22 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-24 13:01 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-24 13:04 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2014-09-24 13:24 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-24 14:20 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-26 20:13 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 21:09 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2014-09-23 15:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/hvm: Forced Emulation Prefix for debug builds of Xen Andrew Cooper
2014-09-23 15:27 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-23 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Andrew Cooper
2014-09-23 16:21 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-25 21:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-23 18:20 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 18:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-23 20:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-24 12:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-26 20:14 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 15:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/svm: Misc cleanup Andrew Cooper
2014-09-26 20:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-23 15:19 ` [PATCH 0/6] HVM Emulation and trap injection fixes Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5422C15D.7030003@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).