From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
jbeulich@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] xen: eliminate scalability issues from initial mapping setup
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:03:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5422CF41.9000803@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5422C512.1010602@citrix.com>
On 09/24/2014 03:20 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 17/09/14 15:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Direct Xen to place the initial P->M table outside of the initial
>> mapping, as otherwise the 1G (implementation) / 2G (theoretical)
>> restriction on the size of the initial mapping limits the amount
>> of memory a domain can be handed initially.
>>
>> As the initial P->M table is copied rather early during boot to
>> domain private memory and it's initial virtual mapping is dropped,
>> the easiest way to avoid virtual address conflicts with other
>> addresses in the kernel is to use a user address area for the
>> virtual address of the initial P->M table. This allows us to just
>> throw away the page tables of the initial mapping after the copy
>> without having to care about address invalidation.
>>
>> It should be noted that this patch won't enable a pv-domain to USE
>> more than 512 GB of RAM. It just enables it to be started with a
>> P->M table covering more memory. This is especially important for
>> being able to boot a Dom0 on a system with more than 512 GB memory.
>
> This doesn't seem to work. It crashes when attempting to construct
> the page tables. Have these patches been tested on a host with > 512 GiB?
Not yet. I did a code review and was pretty sure the memory above 512GB
would be ignored - seems as if I was wrong.
I'll have access to a machine with 1TB RAM soon, so I'll try to test a
patch which really does what I thought should be done: ignoring the
memory above 512GB.
Thanks for testing!
Juergen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-24 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-17 14:59 [PATCH V3] xen: remove some memory limits from pv-domains Juergen Gross
2014-09-17 14:59 ` [PATCH V3] xen: eliminate scalability issues from initial mapping setup Juergen Gross
2014-09-23 3:58 ` Juergen Gross
2014-09-23 13:10 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-24 13:20 ` David Vrabel
2014-09-24 14:03 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2014-09-26 7:54 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5422CF41.9000803@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).