From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, roy.franz@linaro.org,
ning.sun@intel.com, jbeulich@suse.com, ross.philipson@citrix.com,
qiaowei.ren@intel.com, richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com,
gang.wei@intel.com, fu.wei@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] xen/x86: Migrate to boot_info structure
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 20:00:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <542314B9.1040105@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411579162-27503-4-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
On 24/09/14 18:19, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> Break multiboot (v1) protocol dependency. It means that most of Xen code
> (excluding preloader) could be bootloader agnostic and does not need almost
> any knowledge about boot protocol. Additionally, we are able to pass all boot
> data to __start_xen() in one bucket without any side channels. I do not mention
> that we are also able to easily identify boot data in Xen code.
>
> Here is boot data flow for legacy BIOS platform:
>
> BIOS -> GRUB -> multiboot[12]* -> __reloc() -> MBD ->-\
> /
> ------<------<------<------<------<------<-----
> \
> \
> ---> __init_boot_info() -> boot_info_mb -> __start_xen() -> boot_info
> /
> BIOS ->-/
>
> * multiboot2 is not implemented yet. Look for it in later patches.
>
> Here is boot data flow for EFI platform:
>
> EFI -> efi_start() -> boot_info_efi -> __start_xen() -> boot_info
>
> WARNING: ARM build could be broken by this patch. We need to agree boot_info
> integration into ARM. Personally I think that it is worth storing all data
> from any bootloader and preloader in boot_info on any architecture. This give
> a chance to share more code between architectures. However, every architecture
> should define its own boot_info (in relevant include/asm directory). Despite
> that it looks that some parts of it could be common, e.g. modules data,
> command line arguments, boot loader name, EFI data, etc., even if types
> would not be the same. So, as it was stated above a lot of code could be
> shared among architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
This patch is basically unreviewable. Please split it up more, starting
with misc cleanup such as video.h vs vga.h
e.g. start with
typedef struct {
/* Boot loader name. */
char *boot_loader_name;
} boot_info_t;
And make some stub declarations which set and retrieve the loader name
alone.
Then over the course of the following patches, move small bits one at a
time into this new structure, such as the command line then memory map,
acpi tables, smbios tables etc. This should probably be at least 8 patches.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-24 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-24 17:19 [PATCH v2 0/5] xen: Break multiboot (v1) dependency and add multiboot2 support Daniel Kiper
2014-09-24 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] xen/x86: Introduce MultiBoot Data (MBD) type Daniel Kiper
2014-09-24 18:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-25 9:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-25 12:56 ` Daniel Kiper
2014-09-25 13:24 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-25 19:24 ` Daniel Kiper
2014-09-26 8:13 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] xen/x86: Define e820 entries counter as unsigned int Daniel Kiper
2014-09-24 18:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-24 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] xen/x86: Migrate to boot_info structure Daniel Kiper
2014-09-24 19:00 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2014-09-25 9:43 ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-25 12:32 ` Daniel Kiper
2014-09-24 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] xen/x86: Use constant as multiboot protocol identifier Daniel Kiper
2014-09-24 18:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-24 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] xen/x86: Add multiboot2 protocol support Daniel Kiper
2014-09-24 19:14 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-25 18:42 ` Daniel Kiper
2014-09-25 18:52 ` Andrew Cooper
2014-09-24 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] xen: Break multiboot (v1) dependency and add multiboot2 support Roy Franz
2014-09-25 9:15 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-25 9:45 ` Ian Campbell
2014-09-25 13:01 ` Daniel Kiper
2014-09-25 15:56 ` Roy Franz
2014-09-25 19:47 ` Daniel Kiper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=542314B9.1040105@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
--cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
--cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=ning.sun@intel.com \
--cc=qiaowei.ren@intel.com \
--cc=richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com \
--cc=ross.philipson@citrix.com \
--cc=roy.franz@linaro.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).