From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 30424: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:19:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5429404A020000780003A4FF@mail.emea.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54293FA4020000780003A4E9@mail.emea.novell.com>
>>> On 29.09.14 at 11:16, <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 27.09.14 at 12:10, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> flight 30424 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/30424/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> test-armhf-armhf-xl 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 30359
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 10 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 30359
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 30359
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3 12 guest-localmigrate.2 fail REGR. vs. 30359
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 30359
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 30359
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 30359
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 30359
>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 12 guest-localmigrate.2 fail REGR. vs. 30359
>> test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 30359
>>[...]
>> version targeted for testing:
>> xen 938edfdf8eefe962693f9e6fc5550652bb181e38
>
> Comparing with flight 30399 (targeting 43103612f6) I would say
> it's almost certainly my APIC related patches that cause these.
> However, looking at test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64's
> serial log I see at least two PV Linux guests (Dom1 and Dom16)
> being created rather than a Win7 one, which I don't know what to
> think of. var-log-xen-xl-win.guest.osstest.log otoh indicates the
> tool stack is thinking Dom1 is a Windows guest.
>
> Otoh the tail of that log is all garbage,
and the most recent readable message is from Aug 12th. All very
odd.
Jan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-29 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-27 10:10 [xen-unstable test] 30424: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass xen.org
2014-09-29 9:16 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 9:19 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5429404A020000780003A4FF@mail.emea.novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).