From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, keir@xen.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
tim@xen.org, dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 11/20] x86/VPMU: Interface for setting PMU mode and flags
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:34:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54297C22.6070909@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5429938B020000780003AA28@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 09/29/2014 11:14 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 25.09.14 at 21:28, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>> +static int vpmu_force_context_switch(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned i, j, allbutself_num, mycpu;
>> + static s_time_t start, now;
> I don't think "now" needs to be static. In fact it would perhaps better
> be moved into the more narrow scope below.
>
>> + struct tasklet **sync_task;
>> + struct vcpu *curr_vcpu = current;
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + allbutself_num = num_online_cpus() - 1;
>> +
>> + sync_task = xzalloc_array(struct tasklet *, allbutself_num);
> So while the allocation further down got broken up properly, this
> till degenerates to an order-greater-0 allocation for beyond 512
> CPUs. I think you'd be better of (ab)using per-CPU data here.
>
>> + if ( !sync_task )
>> + {
>> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "vpmu_force_context_switch: out of memory\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for ( i = 0; i < allbutself_num; i++ )
>> + {
>> + sync_task[i] = xmalloc(struct tasklet);
>> + if ( sync_task[i] == NULL )
>> + {
>> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING "vpmu_force_context_switch: out of memory\n");
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + tasklet_init(sync_task[i], vpmu_sched_checkin, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + atomic_set(&vpmu_sched_counter, 0);
>> +
>> + j = 0;
>> + mycpu = smp_processor_id();
>> + for_each_online_cpu( i )
>> + {
>> + if ( i != mycpu )
>> + tasklet_schedule_on_cpu(sync_task[j++], i);
>> + }
>> +
>> + vpmu_save(curr_vcpu);
>> +
>> + start = NOW();
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Note that we may fail here if a CPU is hot-plugged while we are
>> + * waiting. We will then time out.
>> + */
>> + while ( atomic_read(&vpmu_sched_counter) != allbutself_num )
>> + {
>> + cpu_relax();
>> +
>> + now = NOW();
>> +
>> + /* Give up after 5 seconds */
>> + if ( now > start + SECONDS(5) )
>> + {
>> + printk(XENLOG_WARNING
>> + "vpmu_force_context_switch: failed to sync\n");
>> + ret = -EBUSY;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Or after 2 milliseconds if need to be preempted */
> /* Or after 2 ms (arbitrary value) if need to be preempted. */
>
>> + if ( (now > start + MILLISECS(2)) && hypercall_preempt_check() )
>> + {
>> + ret = -EAGAIN;
>> + break;
>> + }
> And then this won't do what (I hope) you want on any continuation:
> "start" doesn't get updated again in that case.
Which is fine, 'start' doesn't need to be be updated, it's not (well,
shouldn't be) a static any longer (just like 'now')
We don't have continuation any more, -EAGAIN will be passed directly to
the user and the whole operation will need to be restarted by user. So
'start' will get reassigned as NOW().
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-29 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-25 19:28 [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 00/20] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 01/20] common/symbols: Export hypervisor symbols to privileged guest Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 14:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-26 15:10 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-26 16:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-29 6:43 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 13:29 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 13:47 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 14:16 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 14:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-26 21:43 ` Daniel De Graaf
2014-09-26 22:12 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 02/20] x86/VPMU: Manage VPMU_CONTEXT_SAVE flag in vpmu_save_force() Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 14:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 03/20] x86/VPMU: Set MSR bitmaps only for HVM/PVH guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 14:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 04/20] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu macros a bit more efficient Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 05/20] intel/VPMU: Clean up Intel VPMU code Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 06/20] vmx: Merge MSR management routines Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 20:48 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 07/20] x86/VPMU: Handle APIC_LVTPC accesses Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 08/20] intel/VPMU: MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL should be initialized to zero Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 09/20] x86/VPMU: Add public xenpmu.h Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 20:49 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-29 14:17 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 14:30 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 15:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 15:41 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 15:48 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 14:57 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 15:40 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 15:56 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 10/20] x86/VPMU: Make vpmu not HVM-specific Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 11/20] x86/VPMU: Interface for setting PMU mode and flags Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 21:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-26 21:24 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 22:00 ` Daniel De Graaf
2014-09-26 22:26 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 13:25 ` Dietmar Hahn
2014-09-29 13:56 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 14:03 ` Dietmar Hahn
2014-09-29 13:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 14:05 ` Dietmar Hahn
2014-09-29 15:14 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 15:34 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2014-10-01 0:48 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-10-01 0:56 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 12/20] x86/VPMU: Initialize PMU for PV(H) guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 22:16 ` Daniel De Graaf
2014-09-26 22:23 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 15:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 15:41 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 15:42 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-29 16:04 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 16:10 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-01 0:16 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 13/20] x86/VPMU: Save VPMU state for PV guests during context switch Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-29 15:52 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 14/20] x86/VPMU: When handling MSR accesses, leave fault injection to callers Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 15/20] x86/VPMU: Add support for PMU register handling on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 16:34 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-26 16:44 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 16:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-29 16:04 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-01 0:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 16/20] x86/VPMU: Handle PMU interrupts for " Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-26 22:09 ` Daniel De Graaf
2014-09-30 8:11 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-30 15:07 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-30 15:44 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-30 16:37 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-10-01 6:49 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-01 12:53 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-10-01 13:18 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-01 14:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-10-01 14:26 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-01 18:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-10-02 6:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-02 13:53 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 17/20] x86/VPMU: Merge vpmu_rdmsr and vpmu_wrmsr Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-30 8:13 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 18/20] x86/VPMU: Add privileged PMU mode Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-30 8:18 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-30 15:16 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 19/20] x86/VPMU: NMI-based VPMU support Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-30 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-01 0:18 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-10-01 7:32 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-25 19:28 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 20/20] x86/VPMU: Move VPMU files up from hvm/ directory Boris Ostrovsky
2014-09-30 8:40 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-26 17:03 ` [PATCH v12 for-xen-4.5 00/20] x86/PMU: Xen PMU PV(H) support Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-29 13:28 ` Dietmar Hahn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54297C22.6070909@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).