From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v7][RFC][PATCH 06/13] hvmloader/ram: check if
 guest memory is out of reserved device memory maps
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:42:59 +0800
Message-ID: <5461DA23.6020105@intel.com>
References: <1414136077-18599-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
	<545320F2.5030103@intel.com>
	<AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D1260D1047@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
	<545354500200007800043D94@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<5457174C.8020400@intel.com>
	<5457515102000078000443B0@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<54574D8F.8060407@intel.com>
	<54575E2D0200007800044443@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<545767C4.7070806@intel.com>
	<5457787002000078000445C7@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<54576DF7.8060408@intel.com>
	<545784830200007800044627@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<54585EAA.20904@intel.com>
	<545894610200007800044A5B@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<545992A2.8070309@intel.com>
	<545A57AD02000078000C1037@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<545B3F4A.5070808@intel.com>
	<545B562F02000078000453FB@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<545C9E97.4040800@intel.com>
	<545CB64E02000078000459CD@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<5461AD94.2070008@intel.com> <5461BF97.1070709@intel.com>
	<5461DED50200007800046520@mail.emea.novell.com>
	<5461DFAF020000780004652B@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5461DFAF020000780004652B@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: yang.z.zhang@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 2014/11/11 17:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 11.11.14 at 10:03, <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 11.11.14 at 08:49, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Unless we move all check inside each callback functions.
>>
>> That's what you should do imo, albeit I realize that the comparing

Yes, I can do this in all existing callback functions but I'm somewhat 
afraid when other guys want to introduce new callback function, who can 
guarantee this should be done as well?

>> of the specific SBDFs will need additional consideration.
>
> Part of which would involve re-considering whether device
> assignment shouldn't be done before memory population in the
> tool stack.
>

Yes, after we introduce this new domctl, we just make sure this domctl 
should be called before memory population no matter when we do assign a 
device as passthrough.

Thanks
Tiejun