From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for 4.5] xen/arm: Add support for GICv3 for domU Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 17:41:50 +0100 Message-ID: <54623C4E.2000209@linaro.org> References: <1414872625-2961-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <20141103163904.GF1638@laptop.dumpdata.com> <54590C48.4080100@linaro.org> <545A5B4F02000078000C1073@mail.emea.novell.com> <545B4325.9000801@linaro.org> <545B577D0200007800045407@mail.emea.novell.com> <545B4D1D.4090000@linaro.org> <20141107154502.GC14076@laptop.dumpdata.com> <545E5A66.2000609@linaro.org> <7EFC68C5-25FF-47E8-83B3-0600246D8937@oracle.com> <1415613783.27002.2.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XoEVt-0007jR-Nb for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:41:53 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r20so2357327wiv.1 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:41:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini , Ian Campbell Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, vijay.kilari@gmail.com, tim@xen.org, Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Stefano, On 10/11/2014 12:38, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 15:26 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> That is to guard against somebody building against libxc or libxl and >>> then becoming dependent on this and then complaining that it is not in >>> Xen 4.6. >> >> libxc does not have a stable API and libxl doesn't expose this interface >> at all. At the hypercall level this is a domctl which simliarly has no >> stable interface. >> >> So I don't think there is any need to wrap anything or guard against >> anything. > > That's true. A comment in the header file wouldn't hurt though. It looks like that Ian has already pushed the patch. Do I need to send a follow-up? Regards, -- Julien Grall