From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
"ian.campbell@citrix.com" <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
"stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com"
<stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
tim@xen.org,
"ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com" <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, yang.z.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [v7][RFC][PATCH 04/13] hvmloader/util: get reserved device memory maps
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:26:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <546EDB0D.8030605@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <545760B60200007800044471@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 2014/11/3 18:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 03.11.14 at 10:55, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 2014/11/3 17:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 03.11.14 at 10:32, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2014/11/3 16:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 03.11.14 at 03:22, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2014/10/31 16:14, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 31.10.14 at 03:20, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2014/10/30 17:13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30.10.14 at 06:55, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2014/10/29 17:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 29.10.14 at 07:54, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks I can remove those stuff from util.h and just add 'extern' to them
>>>>>>>>>>>> when we really need them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please stop thinking this way. Declarations for things defined in .c
>>>>>>>>>>> files are to be present in headers, and the defining .c file has to
>>>>>>>>>>> include that header (making sure declaration and definition are and
>>>>>>>>>>> remain in sync). I hate having to again repeat my remark that you
>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't forget it's not application code that you're modifying.
>>>>>>>>>>> Robust and maintainable code are a requirement in the hypervisor
>>>>>>>>>>> (and, as said it being an extension of it, hvmloader). Which - just
>>>>>>>>>>> to avoid any misunderstanding - isn't to say that this shouldn't also
>>>>>>>>>>> apply to application code. It's just that in the hypervisor and kernel
>>>>>>>>>>> (and certain other code system components) the consequences of
>>>>>>>>>>> being lax are much more severe.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Okay. But currently, the pci.c file already include 'util.h' and
>>>>>>>>>> '<xen/memory.h>,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> #include "util.h"
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> #include <xen/memory.h>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We can't redefine struct xen_reserved_device_memory in util.h.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Redefine? I said forward declare.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Seems we just need to declare hvm_get_reserved_device_memory_map() in
>>>>>>>> the head file, tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.h,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> unsigned int hvm_get_reserved_device_memory_map(void);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To me this looks very much like poor programming style, even if in
>>>>>>> the context of hvmloader communicating information via global
>>>>>>> variables rather than function arguments and return values is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you mean you don't like a global variable? But it can be use to get
>>>>>> RDM without more hypercall or function call in the context of hvmloader.
>>>>>
>>>>> This argument which you brought up before, and which we commented
>>>>> on before, is pretty pointless. We don't really care much about doing
>>>>> one or two more hypercalls from hvmloader, unless these would be
>>>>> long-running ones.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Another benefit to use a global variable is that we wouldn't allocate
>>>> xen_reserved_device_memory * N each time, and reduce some duplicated
>>>> codes, unless you mean I should define that as static inside in local.
>>>
>>> Now this reason is indeed worth a consideration. How many times is
>>> the data being needed/retrieved?
>>
>> Currently there are two cases in tools/hvmloader, setup pci and build
>> e820 table. Each time, as you know we don't know how may entries we
>> should require, so we always allocate one instance then according to the
>> return value to allocate the proper instances to get that.
>
> Hmm, two uses isn't really that bad, i.e. I'd then still be in favor of
> a more "normal" interface.
>
Just go back here since I realize we always use mem_alloc(), which is
pick from RESERVED_MEMORY, to allocate all buffer inside this hypercall
caller in hvmloader, but unfortunately we have no any associated free
function implementation in hvmloader, so if we call this multiple times
this means it really waster more memory in RESERVED_MEMORY. So I still
think one global variable should be fine.
Thanks
Tiejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 180+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-24 7:34 [v7][RFC][PATCH 01/13] xen: RMRR fix Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 01/13] introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 14:11 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 2:11 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 2:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 9:42 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 2:22 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 13:35 ` Julien Grall
2014-10-28 2:35 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 10:36 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-29 0:40 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 8:53 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 2:53 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 9:10 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-31 1:03 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 02/13] tools/libxc: introduce hypercall for xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 03/13] tools/libxc: check if modules space is overlapping with reserved device memory Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 04/13] hvmloader/util: get reserved device memory maps Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 14:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 3:12 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 9:45 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 5:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 9:48 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-29 6:54 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 9:05 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 5:55 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 9:13 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-31 2:20 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-31 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 2:22 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 8:53 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 9:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 9:45 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 9:55 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 10:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-21 6:26 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2014-11-21 7:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-21 7:54 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-21 8:01 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-21 8:54 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-21 9:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-24 14:27 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 5:07 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 05/13] hvmloader/mmio: reconcile guest mmio with reserved device memory Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 7:12 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 9:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 7:11 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 9:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-29 7:03 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 9:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 3:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 06/13] hvmloader/ram: check if guest memory is out of reserved device memory maps Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 14:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 8:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 10:17 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 7:47 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-29 7:43 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 9:15 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 3:11 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 9:20 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-31 5:41 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-31 6:21 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-10-31 7:02 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-31 8:20 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 5:49 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 8:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 9:40 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 9:51 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 11:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 11:43 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 11:58 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 12:34 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-04 5:05 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-04 7:54 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-05 2:59 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-05 17:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-06 9:28 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-06 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-07 10:27 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-07 11:08 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-11 6:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-11 7:49 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-11 9:03 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-11 9:06 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-11 9:42 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-11 10:07 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 1:36 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-12 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 8:45 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-12 9:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 9:13 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-12 9:56 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 10:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-19 8:17 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-20 7:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-20 8:04 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-20 8:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-20 14:40 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-20 14:46 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-20 20:11 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 0:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2014-11-12 3:05 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-12 8:55 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 10:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-12 10:24 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-12 10:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-13 3:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-14 2:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-14 8:21 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-17 7:31 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-17 7:57 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-17 10:05 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-17 11:08 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-17 11:17 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-17 11:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-17 11:51 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-18 3:08 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-18 8:01 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-18 8:16 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-18 9:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-19 1:26 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-20 7:31 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-20 8:12 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-20 8:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-20 10:28 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-11 8:59 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-11 9:35 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-11 9:42 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-11 9:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 07/13] xen/x86/p2m: introduce p2m_check_reserved_device_memory Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 15:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 8:50 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 08/13] xen/x86/p2m: set p2m_access_n for reserved device memory mapping Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 15:11 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 9:05 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 10:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 8:26 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-29 8:20 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 9:20 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 7:39 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 9:24 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-31 2:50 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-31 8:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 6:20 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 9:00 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 9:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 10:03 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-03 11:48 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-03 11:53 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-04 1:35 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-04 8:02 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-04 10:41 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-11-04 11:41 ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-04 11:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 09/13] xen/x86/ept: handle reserved device memory in ept_handle_violation Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 10/13] xen/x86/p2m: introduce set_identity_p2m_entry Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 11/13] xen:vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 12/13] xen/vtd: re-enable USB device assignment Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 7:34 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 13/13] xen/vtd: group assigned device with RMRR Tiejun Chen
2014-10-24 10:52 ` [v7][RFC][PATCH 01/13] xen: RMRR fix Jan Beulich
2014-10-27 2:00 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-27 9:41 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 8:36 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-28 9:34 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-28 9:39 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2014-10-29 0:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 0:48 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 2:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 8:45 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 8:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 9:07 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-31 3:11 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-29 8:44 ` Jan Beulich
2014-10-30 2:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-30 22:15 ` Tim Deegan
2014-10-31 2:53 ` Chen, Tiejun
2014-10-31 9:10 ` Tim Deegan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=546EDB0D.8030605@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).