From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Tiejun" Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 0/4] xen: introduce new machine for IGD passthrough Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 08:40:25 +0800 Message-ID: <54727E79.4040904@intel.com> References: <1407836957-29098-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <20141123101047.GA3109@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141123101047.GA3109@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 2014/11/23 18:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:49:13PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote: >> v5: >> >> * Simplify to make sure its really inherited from the standard one in patch #3 >> * Then drop the original patch #3 > > I carried > i440fx: make types configurable at run-time > pc_init1: pass parameters just with types > xen:hw:pci-host:piix: create host bridge to passthrough > qom-test: blacklist xenigd > xen:hw:i386:pc_piix: introduce new machine for IGD passthrough > > on my branch for a while now, but I'm not sure it's all still needed. They may not be necessary since you and Paolo already are fine to live without that separate machine specific to IGD passthrough. > If yes simply include these patches next time you repost the > patchset. Anyway, I will comment this point once I can issue next revision. Thanks for your reminder. Tiejun