From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xen: arm: handle PCI DT node ranges and interrupt-map properties Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 15:13:17 +0000 Message-ID: <54E4AC0D.9050809@linaro.org> References: <1414144694.15687.31.camel@citrix.com> <1414144717-32328-5-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <54E37B62.4020101@linaro.org> <1424267412.27775.62.camel@citrix.com> <54E49F55.2010402@linaro.org> <1424270232.27775.83.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1424270232.27775.83.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar , Clark Laughlin , tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 18/02/2015 14:37, Ian Campbell wrote: > I am reasonably convinced that for MMIO (+IO+CFG space) we should map > everything as described by the ranges property of the top most node, it > can be considered an analogue to / extension of the reg property of that > node. BTW, the CFG space is part of the "reg" property, which is already mapped. The "ranges" property only covers the IO/MMIO BARs. -- Julien Grall