From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: AndrewCooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>,
"uma.sharma523@gmail.com" <uma.sharma523@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_credit2.c: runqueue_per_core code
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:40:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550AB5B3.9020308@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550AB812020000780006B872@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 03/19/2015 10:50 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 19.03.15 at 11:03, <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
>> OTOH, CPU_STARTING callbacks run:
>> - on the cpu being brought up;
>> - with interrupt disabled (see how the call to local_irq_enable(), in
>> start_secondary(), is *after* the invocation of
>> notify_cpu_starting()).
>>
>> Here we are. And the reason why things works ok in Credit2, is that
>> csched2_alloc_pdata() doesn't really allocate anything! In fact, in
>> general, handling alloc_pdata() during CPU_STARTING would mean that we
>> can't allocate any memory which, given the name of the function, would
>> look rather odd. :-)
>>
>> Nevertheless I see the value of doing so, and hence I think what we
>> could do would be to introduce a new hook in the scheduler interface,
>> called .init_pdata or .init_pcpu, and, in sched_*.c, split the
>> allocation and the initialization parts. The former will be handled
>> during CPU_UP_PREPARE, when allocation is possible, the latter during
>> CPU_STARTING, when we have more info available to perform actual
>> initializations.
>
> Another alternative would be a new CPU_ALIVE (name subject to
> change) notification after interrupts got enabled. That would (as
> a follow-up cleanup) also allow the MTRR and microcode setup on
> the CPU to no longer need explicit calls (which look reversed
> anyway - surely we should update microcode before fiddling with
> MTRRs).
local_irq_enable() happens after setting the cpu as online in
cpu_online_map; not having the scheduler ready to actually schedule on
it at that time seems like it's asking for trouble.
/me pokes around and thinks some more...
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 18:11 [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_credit2.c: runqueue_per_core code Uma Sharma
2015-03-13 18:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-03-13 19:13 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 12:48 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 12:51 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 12:56 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 13:26 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-17 18:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 7:56 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-18 8:53 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 15:26 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-18 15:59 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-18 16:08 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-18 16:30 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 16:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 17:05 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-19 10:03 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-19 10:50 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-19 11:23 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-19 11:40 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2015-03-19 12:29 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-19 12:35 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-19 13:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 12:45 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 12:49 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=550AB5B3.9020308@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=uma.sharma523@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox