Xen-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: AndrewCooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>,
	"uma.sharma523@gmail.com" <uma.sharma523@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_credit2.c: runqueue_per_core code
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:40:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550AB5B3.9020308@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550AB812020000780006B872@mail.emea.novell.com>

On 03/19/2015 10:50 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 19.03.15 at 11:03, <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
>> OTOH, CPU_STARTING callbacks run:
>>  - on the cpu being brought up;
>>  - with interrupt disabled (see how the call to local_irq_enable(), in
>>    start_secondary(), is *after* the invocation of
>>    notify_cpu_starting()).
>>
>> Here we are. And the reason why things works ok in Credit2, is that
>> csched2_alloc_pdata() doesn't really allocate anything! In fact, in
>> general, handling alloc_pdata() during CPU_STARTING would mean that we
>> can't allocate any memory which, given the name of the function, would
>> look rather odd. :-)
>>
>> Nevertheless I see the value of doing so, and hence I think what we
>> could do would be to introduce a new hook in the scheduler interface,
>> called .init_pdata or .init_pcpu, and, in sched_*.c, split the
>> allocation and the initialization parts. The former will be handled
>> during CPU_UP_PREPARE, when allocation is possible, the latter during
>> CPU_STARTING, when we have more info available to perform actual
>> initializations.
> 
> Another alternative would be a new CPU_ALIVE (name subject to
> change) notification after interrupts got enabled. That would (as
> a follow-up cleanup) also allow the MTRR and microcode setup on
> the CPU to no longer need explicit calls (which look reversed
> anyway - surely we should update microcode before fiddling with
> MTRRs).

local_irq_enable() happens after setting the cpu as online in
cpu_online_map; not having the scheduler ready to actually schedule on
it at that time seems like it's asking for trouble.

/me pokes around and thinks some more...

 -George

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-19 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-13 18:11 [PATCH v2 2/2] sched_credit2.c: runqueue_per_core code Uma Sharma
2015-03-13 18:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-03-13 19:13   ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 12:48     ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 12:51       ` George Dunlap
2015-03-16 12:56         ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 13:26           ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-17 18:18           ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18  7:56             ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-18  8:53               ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 15:26                 ` George Dunlap
2015-03-18 15:59                   ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-18 16:08                     ` George Dunlap
2015-03-18 16:30                       ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 16:49                   ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-18 17:05                     ` George Dunlap
2015-03-19 10:03                       ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-19 10:50                         ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-19 11:23                           ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-19 11:40                           ` George Dunlap [this message]
2015-03-19 12:29                             ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-19 12:35                               ` George Dunlap
2015-03-19 13:00                                 ` Dario Faggioli
2015-03-16 12:45 ` Jan Beulich
2015-03-16 12:49 ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550AB5B3.9020308@eu.citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=uma.sharma523@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox