From: Tobias Geiger <tobias.geiger@vido.info>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>,
"Ren, Yongjie" <yongjie.ren@intel.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: Regression in kernel 3.5 as Dom0 regarding PCI Passthrough?!
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:32:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <553cc0393c35dc3aff8ffa040b96831a@vido.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120905185412.GA27077@phenom.dumpdata.com>
FYI:
This Dom0-Crash only happens, when i shuttdown the DomU within the
DomU, meaning when i choose "Start - Shutdown" within Windows7.
The Crash does NOT happen, when i do "xl shutdown domu" ... ?! :)
Greetings
Tobias
Am 05.09.2012 20:54, schrieb Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk:
>> > > > And its due to a patch I added in v3.4
>> > > > (cd9db80e5257682a7f7ab245a2459648b3c8d268)
>> > > > - which did not work properly in v3.4, but with v3.5 got it
>> working
>> > > > (977f857ca566a1e68045fcbb7cfc9c4acb077cf0) which causes v3.5
>> to
>> > now
>> > > > work
>> > > > anymore.
>> > > >
>> > > > Anyhow, for right now jsut revert
>> > > > cd9db80e5257682a7f7ab245a2459648b3c8d268
>> > > > and it should work for you.
>> > > >
>> Confirmed, after reverting that commit, VT-d will work fine.
>> Will you fix this and push it to upstream Linux, Konrad?
>>
>> > > Also, our team reported a VT-d bug 2 months ago.
>> > > http://bugzilla.xen.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1824
>> >
>
> Can either one of you please test this patch, please:
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> index 097e536..425bd0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
> * Ryan Wilson <hap9@epoch.ncsc.mil>
> * Chris Bookholt <hap10@epoch.ncsc.mil>
> */
> +#define DEBUG 1
> +
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> @@ -97,13 +99,15 @@ static void pcistub_device_release(struct kref
> *kref)
> /* Call the reset function which does not take lock as this
> * is called from "unbind" which takes a device_lock mutex.
> */
> + dev_dbg(&psdev->dev->dev, "FLR locked..\n");
> __pci_reset_function_locked(psdev->dev);
> if (pci_load_and_free_saved_state(psdev->dev,
> &dev_data->pci_saved_state)) {
> dev_dbg(&psdev->dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> - } else
> + } else {
> + dev_dbg(&psdev->dev->dev, "Reloading PCI state..\n");
> pci_restore_state(psdev->dev);
> -
> + }
> /* Disable the device */
> xen_pcibk_reset_device(psdev->dev);
>
> @@ -353,16 +357,16 @@ static int __devinit pcistub_init_device(struct
> pci_dev *dev)
> if (err)
> goto config_release;
>
> - dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "reseting (FLR, D3, etc) the device\n");
> - __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> -
> /* We need the device active to save the state. */
> dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "save state of device\n");
> pci_save_state(dev);
> dev_data->pci_saved_state = pci_store_saved_state(dev);
> if (!dev_data->pci_saved_state)
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "Could not store PCI conf saved state!\n");
> -
> + else {
> + dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "reseting (FLR, D3, etc) the device\n");
> + __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> + }
> /* Now disable the device (this also ensures some private device
> * data is setup before we export)
> */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-28 8:25 Regression in kernel 3.5 as Dom0 regarding PCI Passthrough?! Ren, Yongjie
2012-08-28 13:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-05 18:54 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-06 11:28 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-09-06 13:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-06 13:24 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-09-07 2:08 ` Ren, Yongjie
2012-09-07 10:37 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-09-06 11:32 ` Tobias Geiger [this message]
2012-09-06 11:46 ` Tobias Geiger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-21 2:41 Ren, Yongjie
2012-08-21 14:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-25 12:30 Tobias Geiger
2012-07-25 13:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-25 14:20 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-07-25 14:32 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-07-25 17:59 ` Tobias Geiger
2012-07-25 18:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-06 16:16 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-20 23:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=553cc0393c35dc3aff8ffa040b96831a@vido.info \
--to=tobias.geiger@vido.info \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=yongjie.ren@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).