xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tobias Geiger <tobias.geiger@vido.info>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org>,
	"Ren, Yongjie" <yongjie.ren@intel.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: Regression in kernel 3.5 as Dom0 regarding PCI Passthrough?!
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:32:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <553cc0393c35dc3aff8ffa040b96831a@vido.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120905185412.GA27077@phenom.dumpdata.com>

FYI:

This Dom0-Crash only happens, when i shuttdown the DomU within the 
DomU, meaning when i choose "Start - Shutdown" within Windows7.
The Crash does NOT happen, when i do "xl shutdown domu" ... ?! :)

Greetings
Tobias

Am 05.09.2012 20:54, schrieb Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk:
>> > > > And its due to a patch I added in v3.4
>> > > > (cd9db80e5257682a7f7ab245a2459648b3c8d268)
>> > > > - which did not work properly in v3.4, but with v3.5 got it 
>> working
>> > > > (977f857ca566a1e68045fcbb7cfc9c4acb077cf0) which causes v3.5 
>> to
>> > now
>> > > > work
>> > > > anymore.
>> > > >
>> > > > Anyhow, for right now jsut revert
>> > > > cd9db80e5257682a7f7ab245a2459648b3c8d268
>> > > > and it should work for you.
>> > > >
>> Confirmed, after reverting that commit, VT-d will work fine.
>> Will you fix this and push it to upstream Linux, Konrad?
>>
>> > > Also, our team reported a VT-d bug 2 months ago.
>> > > http://bugzilla.xen.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1824
>> >
>
> Can either one of you please test this patch, please:
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> index 097e536..425bd0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
>   * Ryan Wilson <hap9@epoch.ncsc.mil>
>   * Chris Bookholt <hap10@epoch.ncsc.mil>
>   */
> +#define DEBUG 1
> +
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> @@ -97,13 +99,15 @@ static void pcistub_device_release(struct kref 
> *kref)
>  	/* Call the reset function which does not take lock as this
>  	 * is called from "unbind" which takes a device_lock mutex.
>  	 */
> +	dev_dbg(&psdev->dev->dev, "FLR locked..\n");
>  	__pci_reset_function_locked(psdev->dev);
>  	if (pci_load_and_free_saved_state(psdev->dev,
>  					  &dev_data->pci_saved_state)) {
>  		dev_dbg(&psdev->dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> -	} else
> +	} else {
> +		dev_dbg(&psdev->dev->dev, "Reloading PCI state..\n");
>  		pci_restore_state(psdev->dev);
> -
> +	}
>  	/* Disable the device */
>  	xen_pcibk_reset_device(psdev->dev);
>
> @@ -353,16 +357,16 @@ static int __devinit pcistub_init_device(struct
> pci_dev *dev)
>  	if (err)
>  		goto config_release;
>
> -	dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "reseting (FLR, D3, etc) the device\n");
> -	__pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> -
>  	/* We need the device active to save the state. */
>  	dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "save state of device\n");
>  	pci_save_state(dev);
>  	dev_data->pci_saved_state = pci_store_saved_state(dev);
>  	if (!dev_data->pci_saved_state)
>  		dev_err(&dev->dev, "Could not store PCI conf saved state!\n");
> -
> +	else {
> +		dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "reseting (FLR, D3, etc) the device\n");
> +		__pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> +	}
>  	/* Now disable the device (this also ensures some private device
>  	 * data is setup before we export)
>  	 */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-06 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-28  8:25 Regression in kernel 3.5 as Dom0 regarding PCI Passthrough?! Ren, Yongjie
2012-08-28 13:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-05 18:54 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-06 11:28   ` Tobias Geiger
2012-09-06 13:05     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-06 13:24       ` Tobias Geiger
2012-09-07  2:08     ` Ren, Yongjie
2012-09-07 10:37       ` Tobias Geiger
2012-09-06 11:32   ` Tobias Geiger [this message]
2012-09-06 11:46   ` Tobias Geiger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-08-21  2:41 Ren, Yongjie
2012-08-21 14:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-25 12:30 Tobias Geiger
2012-07-25 13:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-07-25 14:20   ` Tobias Geiger
2012-07-25 14:32     ` Tobias Geiger
2012-07-25 17:59   ` Tobias Geiger
2012-07-25 18:09     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-06 16:16   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-20 23:30     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=553cc0393c35dc3aff8ffa040b96831a@vido.info \
    --to=tobias.geiger@vido.info \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=yongjie.ren@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).