From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/13] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 11:19:43 +0100 Message-ID: <555476BF.90907@citrix.com> References: <1428657724-3498-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <1428657724-3498-8-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <554CDF5E.8050806@citrix.com> <55506B8C.2070903@intel.com> <55507BA1.7000008@citrix.com> <555436ED.8020209@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <555436ED.8020209@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Chen, Tiejun" , Julien Grall , JBeulich@suse.com, tim@xen.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, yang.z.zhang@intel.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Chen, On 14/05/15 06:47, Chen, Tiejun wrote: >> This assign_device callback deals with the latter. So from the name the >> value doesn't look right. >> > > What about XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_XXX? That would be better naming. I would also add a XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_NO_RDM that would be use for non-PCI assignment Regards, -- Julien Grall