From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: tim@xen.org, kevin.tian@intel.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com,
ian.campbell@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, yang.z.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 13/13] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 16:47:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5555B2B4.2060609@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5555C671020000780007A6DD@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 2015/5/15 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 15.05.15 at 10:00, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 2015/5/15 15:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 15.05.15 at 09:11, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2015/5/15 14:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 15.05.15 at 08:39, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015/5/15 14:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 15.05.15 at 08:11, <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Even we may separate the
>>>>>>>> low memory to construct memory_map.map[]...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry I just mean that the low memory is not represented with only one
>>>>>> memory_map.map[] in some cases.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's correct.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So just lets keep that original BUG_ON()?
>>>
>>> In your previous reply you seemed to agree that the BUG_ON() is
>>> becoming meaningless. Why do you now suggest to keep it then?
>>>
>>
>> Sorry just let me clear this.
>>
>> We still need to check this,
>>
>> (hvm_info->low_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT) < (2u << 20)
>>
>> Right? I agree the original is really less relevant as you said.
>
> And I didn't ask you to drop it. All I asked it to amend it with another
> BUG_ON() checking what the one above won't cover anymore.
>
Another point hits me in this case while we're discussing MMIO in
another email.
We may populate RAM to get enough MMIO in pci_setup() so this means
hvm_info->low_mem_pgend would be changed. Furthermore, low_mem_pgend
isn't going to keep recording our original lowmem while building domain.
So I think this original BUG_ON() is still good to cover this case. But
obviously, we need to adjust its associated memory_map.map[x] right now.
So what about this?
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
unsigned int bios_image_base)
{
unsigned int nr = 0, i, j;
+ uint64_t low_mem_pgend = hvm_info->low_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT;
if ( !lowmem_reserved_base )
lowmem_reserved_base = 0xA0000;
@@ -117,9 +118,6 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
e820[nr].type = E820_RESERVED;
nr++;
- /* Low RAM goes here. Reserve space for special pages. */
- BUG_ON((hvm_info->low_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT) < (2u << 20));
-
/*
* Explicitly reserve space for special pages.
* This space starts at RESERVED_MEMBASE an extends to cover various
@@ -162,6 +160,17 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
nr++;
}
+ /* Low RAM goes here. Reserve space for special pages. */
+ BUG_ON(low_mem_pgend < (2u << 20));
+ /* We may need to adjust lowmem end. */
+ for ( i = 0; i < memory_map.nr_map; i++ )
+ {
+ uint64_t end = e820[i].addr + e820[i].size;
+ if ( e820[i].type == E820_RAM &&
+ low_mem_pgend > e820[i].addr && low_mem_pgend < end )
+ e820[i].size = low_mem_pgend - e820[i].addr;
+ }
+
/* May need to reorder all e820 entries. */
for ( j = 0; j < nr-1; j++ )
{
Thanks
Tiejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-10 9:21 [RFC][PATCH 00/13] Fix RMRR Tiejun Chen
2015-04-10 9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/13] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Tiejun Chen
2015-05-08 13:04 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-11 5:35 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-11 14:54 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-15 1:52 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-18 1:06 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-18 19:17 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-19 3:16 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-19 9:42 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-19 10:50 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-19 11:00 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-20 5:27 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-20 8:36 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-20 8:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-20 9:07 ` Wei Liu
2015-04-10 9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/13] introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-04-16 14:59 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-16 15:10 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-16 15:24 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-16 15:40 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-04-23 12:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-23 12:59 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-24 1:17 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-24 7:21 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-10 9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/13] tools/libxc: Expose new hypercall xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-05-08 13:07 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-11 5:36 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-11 9:50 ` Wei Liu
2015-04-10 9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/13] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM Tiejun Chen
2015-04-15 13:10 ` Ian Jackson
2015-04-15 18:22 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-04-23 12:31 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-20 11:13 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-06 15:00 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-06 15:34 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-07 2:22 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-07 6:04 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-08 1:14 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-08 1:24 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-08 15:13 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-11 6:06 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-08 14:43 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-11 8:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-11 11:32 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-14 8:27 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-18 1:06 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-18 20:00 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-19 1:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-05-19 10:22 ` Wei Liu
2015-05-19 6:47 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10 9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/13] xen/x86/p2m: introduce set_identity_p2m_entry Tiejun Chen
2015-04-16 15:05 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 12:33 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10 9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/13] xen:vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2015-04-16 15:16 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-16 15:50 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-04-10 9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/13] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-04-16 15:40 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 12:32 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-23 13:05 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-23 13:59 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-23 14:26 ` Tim Deegan
2015-05-04 8:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-04-20 13:36 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-11 8:37 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-08 16:07 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-11 8:42 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-11 9:51 ` Julien Grall
2015-05-11 10:57 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-14 5:48 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-14 20:13 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-14 5:47 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-14 10:19 ` Julien Grall
2015-04-10 9:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/13] tools: extend xc_assign_device() " Tiejun Chen
2015-04-20 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-11 9:45 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-11 10:53 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-14 7:04 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10 9:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/13] xen: enable XENMEM_set_memory_map in hvm Tiejun Chen
2015-04-16 15:42 ` Tim Deegan
2015-04-20 13:46 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 2:33 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 6:12 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 6:24 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 6:35 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 6:59 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10 9:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/13] tools: extend XENMEM_set_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-04-10 10:01 ` Wei Liu
2015-04-13 2:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-13 11:02 ` Wei Liu
2015-04-14 0:42 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-05 9:32 ` Wei Liu
2015-04-20 13:51 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 2:57 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 6:16 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 7:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 7:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 7:51 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10 9:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/13] hvmloader: get guest memory map into memory_map[] Tiejun Chen
2015-04-20 13:57 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 3:10 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-04-10 9:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/13] hvmloader/pci: skip reserved ranges Tiejun Chen
2015-04-20 14:21 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 3:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 6:19 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 7:34 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 7:44 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 8:16 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 8:31 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 9:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 9:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-04-10 9:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/13] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table Tiejun Chen
2015-04-20 14:29 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 6:11 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 6:25 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 6:39 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 6:56 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 7:11 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 7:34 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 8:00 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-05-15 8:12 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 8:47 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2015-05-15 8:54 ` Jan Beulich
2015-05-15 9:18 ` Chen, Tiejun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5555B2B4.2060609@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).