From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for Xen 4.6 0/4] Enabling XL to set per-VCPU parameters of a domain for RTDS scheduler Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 09:50:16 +0100 Message-ID: <556C1CC8.10301@eu.citrix.com> References: <1432630782.14664.60.camel@citrix.com> <1432898136.5077.13.camel@citrix.com> <556C1994.4090101@eu.citrix.com> <1433148506.15036.78.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1433148506.15036.78.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Wei Liu , Dario Faggioli , Ian Jackson , xen-devel , Meng Xu , Meng Xu , Jan Beulich , Chong Li , Dagaen Golomb List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/01/2015 09:48 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 09:36 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap >> --- >> CC: Ian Campbell >> CC: Wei Liu > > Most people put the Cc about the cut (---) which is fine too. It means > the history ends up recording who was copied on the patch, which isn't > necessarily a bad thing. Right -- I would have thought that was useless information cluttering up the history, but I can see how it might actually be useful. Should I start putting my CC's above the ---? :-) -George