From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/18] Add ITS support Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:52:37 +0100 Message-ID: <55881325.4030104@citrix.com> References: <1434974517-12136-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1434974517-12136-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: vijay.kilari@gmail.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, julien.grall@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, Vijaya Kumar K , manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Vijay, On 22/06/15 13:01, vijay.kilari@gmail.com wrote: > From: Vijaya Kumar K > > This is based on DraftF version > http://xenbits.xen.org/people/ianc/vits/draftF.pdf > > Following major features are supported > - GICv3 ITS support for arm64 platform > - Only Dom0 is supported > > Basic boot is tested with single ITS node with hacks > in pci driver. What about a proper support without hack? > All Comments from V2 version are not > fixed as this series is based on new design. I agree that any comments on code that is not present anymore should be skipped. But all the others should have been fixed and it's not the case. The time I will spend to find the same errors and write the same comments could have been spend more usefully to review the new design... Please help us to speed up the review and make possible to merge ITS support in Xen 4.6. Regards, -- Julien Grall