From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/mm: use is_..._vcpu() instead of open coding it
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:13:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <558985AD.3060602@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5589955E02000078000886E3@mail.emea.novell.com>
On 06/23/2015 04:20 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> @@ -1851,9 +1851,7 @@ unsigned long paging_gva_to_gfn(struct v
> struct p2m_domain *hostp2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(v->domain);
> const struct paging_mode *hostmode = paging_get_hostmode(v);
>
> - if ( is_hvm_domain(v->domain)
> - && paging_mode_hap(v->domain)
> - && nestedhvm_is_n2(v) )
> + if ( is_hvm_vcpu(v) && paging_mode_hap(v->domain) && nestedhvm_is_n2(v) )
> {
> unsigned long gfn;
> struct p2m_domain *p2m;
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
> @@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ int sh_unsync(struct vcpu *v, mfn_t gmfn
> if ( pg->shadow_flags &
> ((SHF_page_type_mask & ~SHF_L1_ANY) | SHF_out_of_sync)
> || sh_page_has_multiple_shadows(pg)
> - || is_pv_domain(v->domain)
> + || is_pv_vcpu(v)
> || !v->domain->arch.paging.shadow.oos_active )
> return 0;
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/none.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/none.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,6 @@ static const struct paging_mode sh_pagin
>
> void shadow_vcpu_init(struct vcpu *v)
> {
> - ASSERT(is_pv_domain(v->domain));
> + ASSERT(is_pv_vcpu(v));
> v->arch.paging.mode = &sh_paging_none;
> }
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-23 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-23 15:14 [PATCH 0/3] x86: further is_..._...() adjustments Jan Beulich
2015-06-23 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: drop is_pv_32on64_vcpu() Jan Beulich
2015-06-23 15:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-24 21:35 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-24 23:49 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-25 1:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-06-25 7:55 ` Jan Beulich
2015-06-23 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: drop is_pv_32on64_domain() Jan Beulich
2015-06-23 15:43 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-23 16:25 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-06 16:01 ` Ian Campbell
2015-06-23 15:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/mm: use is_..._vcpu() instead of open coding it Jan Beulich
2015-06-23 15:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-06-23 16:13 ` George Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=558985AD.3060602@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox