From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Elena Ufimtseva <elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [CALL-FOR-AGENDA] Monthly Xen.org Technical Call (2015-07-08)
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:27:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559503FB.3010508@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435826737.21469.314.camel@citrix.com>
El 02/07/15 a les 10.45, Ian Campbell ha escrit:
> On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 09:32 +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> El 01/07/15 a les 18.15, Boris Ostrovsky ha escrit:
>>> On 07/01/2015 11:57 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>>> The next Xen technical call will be at:
>>>> Wed 8 Jul 17:00:00 BST 2015
>>>> `date -d @1436371200`
>>>>
>>>> See http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-01/msg00414.html
>>>> for more information on the call.
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know (CC-ing the list) any topics which you would like to
>>>> discuss. It might be useful to include:
>>>>
>>>> * References to any relevant/recent mailing list threads;
>>>> * Other people who you think should be involved in the discussion (and
>>>> CC them);
>>>>
>>>> If you would like to attend then please let me know so I can send you the
>>>> dial in details.
>>>
>>>
>>> Given that there is fair amount of PVH-related work happening now
>>> (Roger's, Elena's and mine) perhaps we should have a discussion about
>>> that to see where we are going?
>>>
>>> Andrew, Tim, Roger, Jan (if he is back from vacation), Elena, Konrad and
>>> David would be good to have present.
>
> Yes, I think this topic would indeed be a worthwhile subject for
> discussion.
>
> I think there is a toolstack element to all this as well, so would it be
> a good idea to have Ian J, Stefano and Wei in addition to me (who will
> be there to run the call in any case)? I'd probably mark them in as
> optional participants for scheduling purposes.
Yes, my series include way more toolstack than hypervisor changes.
>> I'm sorry but I will be on vacation next week, hiking in the mountains
>> without Internet or cell phone coverage, so I won't be able to join the
>> meeting.
>
> I think you are one of the critical participants in the discussion, i.e.
> we can't go ahead without you.
>
>> I will be back on the 20th, maybe we can arrange to do another of this
>> PVH meetings on the next technical call in early August?
>
> The August call is scheduled for 12 August, which is 6 weeks from
> yesterday.
>
> We could either go for that or if it is too far out we could push the
> July iteration of the call back two weeks to Wednesday 22 July (so 3
> weeks from yesterday). (a one week slip would still land in your
> vacation time).
I would rather go for the 22 or 29 of July or the 5 of August, because
I'm also on vacations from the 10 to the 16 of August.
> There is also the devsummit in the week 17 August (~7 weeks time) which
> is an opportunity for a f2f.
>
> Shall I put up a poll of some sort to gather preferred timeslot options
> out of that set?
That sounds fine, thanks.
Roger.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-02 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 15:57 [CALL-FOR-AGENDA] Monthly Xen.org Technical Call (2015-07-08) Ian Campbell
2015-07-01 16:15 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-01 16:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-02 7:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-07-02 8:45 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-02 9:27 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2015-07-02 9:37 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-02 15:16 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-03 12:55 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-06 15:57 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-02 10:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-07-07 12:16 ` Ian Campbell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-06 17:11 Elena Ufimtseva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559503FB.3010508@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).