From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/16] x86/hvm: unify internal portio and mmio intercepts Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 16:52:04 +0200 Message-ID: <55955014.8090609@citrix.com> References: <1435669558-5421-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> <1435669558-5421-6-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAfqW-0006wk-7h for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 14:52:12 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1435669558-5421-6-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Paul Durrant , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Andrew Cooper , Keir Fraser , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org El 30/06/15 a les 15.05, Paul Durrant ha escrit: [...] +void msixtbl_init(struct domain *d) > +{ > + register_mmio_handler(d, &msixtbl_mmio_ops); Since you are adding an initialization function to vmsi I think msixtbl_list and msixtbl_list_lock should also be initialized here instead of hvm_domain_initialise. Roger.