From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/22] Introduce HVM without dm and new boot ABI Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:02:23 +0200 Message-ID: <5596337F.3090701@citrix.com> References: <1435761975-98579-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> <5595EC68.70907@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZAuzV-00034V-Jy for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 07:02:29 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5595EC68.70907@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Yang Hongyang , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org El 03/07/15 a les 3.59, Yang Hongyang ha escrit: > Hi Roger, > > This seems to be a PVH guest, but IIRC a PVH guest should explicitly > specify 'pvh' in the config, maybe I'm wrong or did I miss some background? > Are there any meterial about this? Not yet. The interface exposed to the guest is very similar to PVH, but instead of being a PV(H) guest from Xen's point of view, this is a HVM guest with emulated devices disabled. Note also that the guest kernel entry point is different from PVH, as is the startup of APs. Instead of setting pvh=1 in the config file the following options are used: builder="hvm" device_model_version="none" Roger.