From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [linux-3.18 test] 59041: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:06:53 -0400 Message-ID: <559AA79D.6060808@oracle.com> References: <1436171567.25646.6.camel@citrix.com> <559A9D49.3020305@oracle.com> <1436197741.25646.121.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1436197741.25646.121.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Elena Ufimtseva , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Andrew Cooper , ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Jan Beulich , Roger Pau Monne List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/06/2015 11:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:22 -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 07/06/2015 04:32 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 22:21 +0000, osstest service owner wrote: >>>> flight 59041 linux-3.18 real [real] >>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/59041/ >>>> >>>> Regressions :-( >>>> >>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >>>> including tests which could not be run: >>>> test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel 11 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 58581 >>> Not really sure who is on the hook for pvh fails these days, copying >>> some likely suspects + x86 maintainers. Looks like the guest is triple >>> faulting. >> >> Looks like something happened between 2015-06-15 and 2015-06-29 (flights >> 58581 and 58976) > Yes, and a bit of the original report I should have quoted is: > > version targeted for testing: > linux ea5dd38e93b3bec3427e5d3eef000bbf5d637e76 > baseline version: > linux d048c068d00da7d4cfa5ea7651933b99026958cf > > See also the complete history of this test on this branch at > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel/linux-3.18.html > >> and it's only 3.18 kernel, right? > As far as I know. But: older linux-X.Y doesn't support PVH, so this test > has always failed at guest-start in those flights, before we would have > gotten to this failure. > > The only newer stable branch which we test is linux-4.1, flight 59054 > from didn't show this issue, but the next one might pick up something > newer, or 4.1.(y+1) might still be in the pipeline upstream and the > issue will show up later. > > We also test linux-linus and linux-next, so far neither of them seems to > exhibit this problem: > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel/linux-linus.html > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvh-intel/linux-next.html > > Which is interesting in itself I suppose. > > Bisection was broken for linux-3.18 until this morning, Ian fixed the > config and it should pick up on this failure and start investigating > once the next flight completes (tonight some time). OK, I'll wait until tomorrow then to see if it (the bisection) is successful. BTW, our last test on Xen4.6/linux4.1+ was on July 1st and it passed too. -boris