From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new
 parameters to set rdm policy
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 23:39:57 +0800
Message-ID: <559BF2CD.7020308@intel.com>
References: <1436249837-14747-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>	<1436249837-14747-11-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>	<21915.48185.41230.587033@mariner.uk.xensource.com>	<559BC02A.6090604@intel.com>	<21915.49816.559101.864128@mariner.uk.xensource.com>	<559BC698.9070409@intel.com>	<21915.54159.831999.669747@mariner.uk.xensource.com>	<559BD9BC.7070203@intel.com>	<21915.58580.475402.265088@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
	<559BED4B.8050000@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <559BED4B.8050000@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> I mean if you don't set these mappings, these devices can't work at all
> and then crash VM like IGD passthrough. But I'm also saying we don't
> pass through any devices in most cases, and those devices which own RDM
> are very rare. So why should we set 'none' to Xen by default?

One typo, s/should/shouldn't/

Thanks
Tiejun