* "x86, arm: remove asm/spinlock.h from all architectures" removed x86's _raw_read_unlock()
@ 2015-07-08 10:45 Jan Beulich
2015-07-08 10:55 ` David Vrabel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2015-07-08 10:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Vrabel; +Cc: xen-devel
David,
I'm afraid we'll need another fixup here, even if things build fine
despite the removal.
Thanks, Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: "x86, arm: remove asm/spinlock.h from all architectures" removed x86's _raw_read_unlock()
2015-07-08 10:45 "x86, arm: remove asm/spinlock.h from all architectures" removed x86's _raw_read_unlock() Jan Beulich
@ 2015-07-08 10:55 ` David Vrabel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Vrabel @ 2015-07-08 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel
On 08/07/15 11:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
> David,
>
> I'm afraid we'll need another fixup here, even if things build fine
> despite the removal.
Ah, we get a generic implementation instead. Thanks for pointing this
out. I'll fix it.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-08 10:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-08 10:45 "x86, arm: remove asm/spinlock.h from all architectures" removed x86's _raw_read_unlock() Jan Beulich
2015-07-08 10:55 ` David Vrabel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).