From: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Fabio Fantoni <fabio.fantoni@m2r.biz>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] x86/hvm: I/O emulation cleanup and fix | Full Backtrace of domU's X crash caused by SSE2 istruction in attachment
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 03:32:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559ECC37.1050901@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559FC1EA020000780008F6E7@mail.emea.novell.com>
Hi Gurus:
We found that MOVD instruction are used by some windows driver
during developing XenGT, and also we found this one:
(XEN) MMIO emulation failed: d7v1 64bit @ 0010:fffff8000294e273 -> 66 0f
e7 00 48 83 c0 10 45 3
b cb 73 f0 45 85 c9
If anyone can help us to upstream this one into instruction emulator and
plus the MOVD instruction emulation, that will be nice. :)
Thanks,
Zhi.
于 07/10/15 19:00, Jan Beulich 写道:
>>>> On 10.07.15 at 12:51, <fabio.fantoni@m2r.biz> wrote:
>> Il 10/07/2015 12:20, Jan Beulich ha scritto:
>>> Other than MOVD, MOVAPS is already being supported by the
>>> insn emulator.
>>>
>> Then why do you think MOVAPS fails in my test?
>
> No idea. That's what Paul asked you to narrow down.
>
>> Sse2 was introduced in cpus 11 years ago, so I think it would be useful
>> to add support for all missing instructions to avoid more cases like
>> this (and it seems to improve performance too, comparing the same task
>> executed with/without sse2).
>
> The reason we didn't add any more of the SSE insns so far is that
> we don't expect them to be used for accessing MMIO. Once we
> learn they're needed, we'll add emulation for them, but you
> realize this is a significant task?
>
> Jan
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-09 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-09 13:10 [PATCH v7 00/15] x86/hvm: I/O emulation cleanup and fix Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 01/15] x86/hvm: remove multiple open coded 'chunking' loops Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 15:13 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 16:16 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 16:24 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 16:27 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 02/15] x86/hvm: change hvm_mmio_read_t and hvm_mmio_write_t length argument Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 03/15] x86/hvm: restrict port numbers and uint16_t and sizes to unsigned int Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 15:24 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 16:10 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 16:20 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 16:23 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 16:31 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 04/15] x86/hvm: unify internal portio and mmio intercepts Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 05/15] x86/hvm: add length to mmio check op Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 06/15] x86/hvm: unify dpci portio intercept with standard portio intercept Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 07/15] x86/hvm: unify stdvga mmio intercept with standard mmio intercept Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 15:33 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 16:12 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 16:21 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 16:24 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 08/15] x86/hvm: limit reps to avoid the need to handle retry Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 09/15] x86/hvm: only call hvm_io_assist() from hvm_wait_for_io() Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 10/15] x86/hvm: split I/O completion handling from state model Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 11/15] x86/hvm: remove HVMIO_dispatched I/O state Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 12/15] x86/hvm: remove hvm_io_state enumeration Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 13/15] x86/hvm: use ioreq_t to track in-flight state Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 14/15] x86/hvm: always re-emulate I/O from a buffer Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 13:10 ` [PATCH v7 15/15] x86/hvm: track large memory mapped accesses by buffer offset Paul Durrant
2015-07-09 15:46 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 16:05 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-10 9:27 ` [PATCH v7 00/15] x86/hvm: I/O emulation cleanup and fix | Full Backtrace of domU's X crash caused by SSE2 istruction in attachment Fabio Fantoni
2015-07-10 9:31 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-10 9:54 ` Fabio Fantoni
2015-07-10 10:09 ` Fabio Fantoni
2015-07-10 10:13 ` Paul Durrant
2015-07-10 10:20 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-10 10:51 ` Fabio Fantoni
2015-07-10 11:00 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 19:32 ` Zhi Wang [this message]
2015-07-10 11:46 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-10 11:49 ` Fabio Fantoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559ECC37.1050901@intel.com \
--to=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=fabio.fantoni@m2r.biz \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).