From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [v8][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:33:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A7CEBB.8090701@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A7CDBF.1030104@intel.com>
On 07/16/2015 04:29 PM, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/7/16 23:16, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 07/16/2015 04:04 PM, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
>>>> Yes, sorry, add_high_mem will be the size of memory *relocated*, not
>>>> the actual end of it (unless, as you say, the original highmem region
>>>> didn't exist).
>>>>
>>>> What I really meant was that either way, after adjusting the highmem
>>>> region in the e820, the end of that region should correspond to
>>>> hvm_info->high_mem_pgend.
>>>>
>>>> What about something like this?
>>>> ---
>>>> /*
>>>> * And then we also need to adjust highmem.
>>>> */
>>>> if ( add_high_mem )
>>>> {
>>>> /*
>>>> * Modify the existing highmem region if it exists
>>>> */
>>>> for ( i = 0; i < nr; i++ )
>>>> {
>>>> if ( e820[i].type == E820_RAM &&
>>>> e820[i].addr == (1ull << 32))
>>>> {
>>>> e820[i].size += add_high_mem;
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * If we didn't find a highmem region, make one
>>>> */
>>>> if ( i == nr )
>>>> {
>>>> e820[nr].addr = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
>>>> e820[nr].size = e820[nr].addr + add_high_mem;
>>>> e820[nr].type = E820_RAM;
>>>> nr++;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> * Either way, at this point i points to the entry containing
>>>> * highmem. Compare it to what's in hvm_info as a sanity
>>>> * check.
>>>> */
>>>> BUG_ON(e820[i].addr+e820[i].size !=
>>>> ((uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT));
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks really better.
>>>
>>> I just introduce a little change based on yours, and I post this as a
>>> whole,
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
>>> b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
>>> index 7a414ab..8c9b01f 100644
>>> --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
>>> +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/e820.c
>>> @@ -105,7 +105,10 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
>>> unsigned int lowmem_reserved_base,
>>> unsigned int bios_image_base)
>>> {
>>> - unsigned int nr = 0;
>>> + unsigned int nr = 0, i, j;
>>> + uint32_t low_mem_end = hvm_info->low_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> + uint64_t high_mem_end = (uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend <<
>>> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> + uint64_t add_high_mem = 0;
>>>
>>> if ( !lowmem_reserved_base )
>>> lowmem_reserved_base = 0xA0000;
>>> @@ -149,13 +152,6 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
>>> e820[nr].type = E820_RESERVED;
>>> nr++;
>>>
>>> - /* Low RAM goes here. Reserve space for special pages. */
>>> - BUG_ON((hvm_info->low_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT) < (2u << 20));
>>> - e820[nr].addr = 0x100000;
>>> - e820[nr].size = (hvm_info->low_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT) -
>>> e820[nr].addr;
>>> - e820[nr].type = E820_RAM;
>>> - nr++;
>>> -
>>> /*
>>> * Explicitly reserve space for special pages.
>>> * This space starts at RESERVED_MEMBASE an extends to cover
>>> various
>>> @@ -191,16 +187,91 @@ int build_e820_table(struct e820entry *e820,
>>> nr++;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -
>>> - if ( hvm_info->high_mem_pgend )
>>> + /*
>>> + * Construct E820 table according to recorded memory map.
>>> + *
>>> + * The memory map created by toolstack may include,
>>> + *
>>> + * #1. Low memory region
>>> + *
>>> + * Low RAM starts at least from 1M to make sure all standard
>>> regions
>>> + * of the PC memory map, like BIOS, VGA memory-mapped I/O and
>>> vgabios,
>>> + * have enough space.
>>> + *
>>> + * #2. Reserved regions if they exist
>>> + *
>>> + * #3. High memory region if it exists
>>> + */
>>> + for ( i = 0; i < memory_map.nr_map; i++ )
>>> {
>>> - e820[nr].addr = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
>>> - e820[nr].size =
>>> - ((uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT) -
>>> e820[nr].addr;
>>> - e820[nr].type = E820_RAM;
>>> + e820[nr] = memory_map.map[i];
>>> nr++;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + /* Low RAM goes here. Reserve space for special pages. */
>>> + BUG_ON(low_mem_end < (2u << 20));
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Its possible to relocate RAM to allocate sufficient MMIO
>>> previously
>>> + * so low_mem_pgend would be changed over there. And here
>>> memory_map[]
>>> + * records the original low/high memory, so if low_mem_end is less
>>> than
>>> + * the original we need to revise low/high memory range in e820.
>>> + */
>>> + for ( i = 0; i < nr; i++ )
>>> + {
>>> + uint64_t end = e820[i].addr + e820[i].size;
>>> + if ( e820[i].type == E820_RAM &&
>>> + low_mem_end > e820[i].addr && low_mem_end < end )
>>> + {
>>> + add_high_mem = end - low_mem_end;
>>> + e820[i].size = low_mem_end - e820[i].addr;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * And then we also need to adjust highmem.
>>> + */
>>> + if ( add_high_mem )
>>> + {
>>> + /* Modify the existing highmem region if it exists. */
>>> + for ( i = 0; i < nr; i++ )
>>> + {
>>> + if ( e820[i].type == E820_RAM &&
>>> + e820[i].addr == ((uint64_t)1 << 32))
>>> + {
>>> + e820[i].size += add_high_mem;
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* If there was no highmem region, just create one. */
>>> + if ( i == nr )
>>> + {
>>> + e820[nr].addr = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
>>> + e820[nr].size = high_mem_end - e820[nr].addr;
>>> + e820[nr].type = E820_RAM;
>>> + nr++;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* A sanity check if high memory is broken. */
>>> + BUG_ON( high_mem_end != e820[i].addr + e820[i].size);
>>
>> The reason I wrote it the way I did was so that we would cross-check our
>> lowmem adjustments (via add_high_mem) with the value in hvm_info in
>> *both cases*.
>>
>> In the code above, you'll get the sanity check if we modify an existing
>> e820 entry; but if we create a new entry, then we don't check to make
>> sure that the amount we removed from the lowmem entry equals the amount
>> we added to the highmem entry.
>
> Are you saying the following two cases are not same?
>
> uint64_t high_mem_end = (uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend << PAGE_SHIFT;
> BUG_ON( high_mem_end != e820[i].addr + e820[i].size);
> vs.
> BUG_ON(e820[i].addr+e820[i].size != ((uint64_t)hvm_info->high_mem_pgend
> << PAGE_SHIFT));
>
> Why? Note hvm_info->high_mem_pgend don't change while build e820 table.
>
> Honestly I didn't try to change that point but maybe I'm missing something?
Yes, you are missing something. :-) I told you exactly what I wanted
changed and what I said could remain the same:
>> By all means, calculate high_mem_end so it's easier to read. But then,
>> when creating a new region, set e820[nr].size = add_high_mem, so that
>> the BUG_ON() that follows actually checks something useful.
Just to be clear, I want the second if() statement to look like this:
>>> + if ( i == nr )
>>> + {
>>> + e820[nr].addr = ((uint64_t)1 << 32);
>>> + e820[nr].size = add_high_mem;
>>> + e820[nr].type = E820_RAM;
>>> + nr++;
>>> + }
Think about why and maybe that will help you understand what I'm talking
about.
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-16 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-17 0:45 [v9][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 01/16] xen: introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 02/16] xen/vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 03/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 6:48 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-20 1:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 04/16] xen: enable XENMEM_memory_map in hvm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 05/16] hvmloader: get guest memory map into memory_map[] Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader/pci: disable all pci devices conflicting with rdm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 13:59 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 14:24 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 7:40 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 9:09 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 10:50 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 15:22 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 15:31 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 15:54 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 16:10 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-18 12:35 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-20 6:19 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 9:27 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 10:53 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 08/16] tools/libxc: Expose new hypercall xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 09/16] tools: extend xc_assign_device() to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 12/16] tools: introduce a new parameter to set a predefined rdm boundary Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 13/16] libxl: construct e820 map with RDM information for HVM guest Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 01/16] xen: introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 02/16] xen/vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 03/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 7:40 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 7:48 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 7:58 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 11:09 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 04/16] xen: enable XENMEM_memory_map in hvm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 05/16] hvmloader: get guest memory map into memory_map[] Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 11:15 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader/pci: disable all pci devices conflicting with rdm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 11:32 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 11:52 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 13:02 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 13:21 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 13:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 13:48 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 14:54 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 15:20 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 15:39 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 16:08 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 16:40 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 21:24 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 16:18 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 16:31 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 21:15 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-17 9:26 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-17 10:55 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 11:47 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 13:12 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 14:29 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 15:04 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 15:16 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 15:29 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 15:33 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2015-07-16 15:42 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 08/16] tools/libxc: Expose new hypercall xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 09/16] tools: extend xc_assign_device() to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 12/16] tools: introduce a new parameter to set a predefined rdm boundary Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:52 ` [v8][PATCH 13/16] libxl: construct e820 map with RDM information for HVM guest Tiejun Chen
2015-07-22 13:55 ` [v8][PATCH 13/16] libxl: construct e820 map with RDM information for HVM guest [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2015-07-16 6:53 ` [v8][PATCH 14/16] xen/vtd: enable USB device assignment Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 6:53 ` [v8][PATCH 15/16] xen/vtd: prevent from assign the device with shared rmrr Tiejun Chen
2015-07-16 7:42 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 6:53 ` [v8][PATCH 16/16] tools: parse to enable new rdm policy parameters Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 14/16] xen/vtd: enable USB device assignment Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 15/16] xen/vtd: prevent from assign the device with shared rmrr Tiejun Chen
2015-07-17 0:45 ` [v9][PATCH 16/16] tools: parse to enable new rdm policy parameters Tiejun Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A7CEBB.8090701@citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).