From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Tiejun" Subject: Re: Requesting for freeze exception for RMRR Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:24:55 +0800 Message-ID: <55A8C9E7.7080702@intel.com> References: <55A35B5E.3000805@intel.com> <20150713114145.GF4108@zion.uk.xensource.com> <55A46575.5020607@intel.com> <20150714092915.GC4152@zion.uk.xensource.com> <55A85758.2010702@intel.com> <20150717091726.GG12455@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150717091726.GG12455@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu Cc: Kevin , "ian.campbell@citrix.com" , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , "ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com" , "Wang, Yong Y" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >> * On hvmloader side, there three patches now: >> patch #5 is reviewed by George and Acked by Jan; >> patch #6 is reviewed just for code implementation but that solution can't >> convince all maintainers. Honestly, this is a rare possibility of collision >> in real world and the original pci allocation is not good so its hard to >> reshape the original mechanism in one week. But actually we also have some >> other solutions but we need a little time to figure out how to step forward >> but I just think any solution wouldn't bring any change to other stuffs. >> patch #7 is pretty close to be Acked. >> >> So what's your final determination? >> > > If you and maintainers can work out a solution for hvmloader bits today > then yes, otherwise no. > Based on my understanding, we already have some solutions but we need some time to put one into practice. I think its possible to work out this next week. As you see other stuffs are almost closed so we can put our all effort just on this bit. Thanks Tiejun