From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: PV-vNUMA issue: topology is misinterpreted by the guest Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:42:55 +0100 Message-ID: <55A8CE1F0200007800092548@mail.emea.novell.com> References: <1437042762.28251.18.camel@citrix.com> <55A7A7F40200007800091D60@mail.emea.novell.com> <55A78DF2.1060709@citrix.com> <20150716152513.GU12455@zion.uk.xensource.com> <55A7D17C.5060602@citrix.com> <55A7D2CC.1050708@oracle.com> <55A7F7F40200007800092152@mail.emea.novell.com> <55A7DE45.4040804@citrix.com> <55A7E2D8.3040203@oracle.com> <55A8B83802000078000924AE@mail.emea.novell.com> <1437118075.23656.25.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZG0IL-0007aT-TP for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:42:58 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1437118075.23656.25.camel@citrix.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dario Faggioli Cc: Elena Ufimtseva , WeiLiu , Andrew Cooper , David Vrabel , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Boris Ostrovsky List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 17.07.15 at 09:27, wrote: > In the meanwhile, what should we do? Document this? How? "don't use > vNUMA with PV guest in SMT enabled systems" seems a bit harsh... Is > there a workaround we can put in place/suggest? Use SLE / openSUSE kernels ;-) ? Jan