From: Ben Catterall <Ben.Catterall@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
tim@xen.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] HVM x86 enhancements to run Xen deprivileged mode operations
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:27:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55CB2D9A.7060001@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55CB3303020000780009A0B8@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 12/08/15 10:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 06.08.15 at 18:45, <Ben.Catterall@citrix.com> wrote:
>> Performance testing
>> -------------------
>> Performance testing indicates that the overhead for this deprivileged mode is
>> approximately 25%. This overhead is the cost of moving into deprivileged mode
>> and then fully back out of deprivileged mode.
>>
>> I performed 100000 writes to a single I/O port on an Intel 2.2GHz Xeon
>> E5-2407 0 processor. This was done from a python script within the HVM guest
>> using time.time() and running Debian Jessie. Each write was trapped to cause a
>> vmexit and the time for each write was calculated. These experiments were
>> repeated. Note that only the host and this HVM guest were running (both Debian
>> Jessie) during the experiments.
>
> I'm not sure I/O port writes (the more without saying to which port)
> are the best suited item for evaluating the overhead: Ideally you
> would pick an operation that is comparably fast (I/O port accesses
> generally aren't if the net effect is that the emulator accesses a
> physical port). But it certainly serves as a first indication (not too
> bad, but large enough that I wouldn't be convinced this is a good
> idea).
>
> Jan
>
Thanks for this Jan: I overlooked this.
Retested with the port (0x1000) i/o emulation operation replaced with a
nop to get the pure overhead. With the operation takes 5.2e-6s and
without takes 1.7e-6s. So the difference is 3.5e-6. That's about 308%
overhead on a nop. So, I'm guessing that whether this is used or not
will depend on the overhead and frequency of the operation it will be
handling.
Thanks,
Ben
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-12 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-06 16:45 [RFC 0/4] HVM x86 enhancements to run Xen deprivileged mode operations Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 16:45 ` [RFC 1/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Page allocation helper Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 19:22 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-07 9:57 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-07 13:14 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-10 8:50 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-10 8:52 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-10 8:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-10 10:08 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-06 16:45 ` [RFC 2/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Create deprivileged page tables Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 19:52 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-07 13:19 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-07 15:20 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-06 16:45 ` [RFC 3/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Code for switching into/out of deprivileged mode Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 20:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-07 12:51 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-07 13:08 ` David Vrabel
2015-08-07 14:24 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-11 9:45 ` Ian Campbell
2015-08-10 9:49 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-10 10:14 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-11 9:55 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-11 16:51 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-11 17:05 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-11 17:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-11 18:29 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-12 13:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-12 13:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-17 13:53 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-17 15:07 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-17 15:17 ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-18 10:25 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-18 10:26 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-18 14:22 ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-18 16:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-19 10:36 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-12 10:10 ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-12 13:22 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-12 13:26 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-20 14:42 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-11 10:35 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 16:45 ` [RFC 4/4] HVM x86 deprivileged mode: Trap handlers for " Ben Catterall
2015-08-06 21:24 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-07 12:32 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-07 13:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-08-07 13:26 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-10 10:07 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-11 10:33 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-17 13:59 ` Ben Catterall
2015-08-17 14:58 ` Tim Deegan
2015-08-17 15:14 ` Jan Beulich
2015-08-12 9:50 ` [RFC 0/4] HVM x86 enhancements to run Xen deprivileged mode operations Jan Beulich
2015-08-12 11:27 ` Ben Catterall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55CB2D9A.7060001@citrix.com \
--to=ben.catterall@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).