From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
To: vijay.kilari@gmail.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com,
stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com,
tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com,
manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com,
Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add domain specific ITS initialization
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:57:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55D22E87.7000909@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1437995524-19772-19-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com>
Hi Vijay,
This patch doesn't only do initialization but also destruction of vGIC info.
Although, a part of the domain initialization is done in part in #8 and
#8. It's very confusing to see the initialization split in 3 different
patch.
I would prefer to see the initialization/destruction in a single patch.
It would help to catch whether you forgot to see you forgot some bits.
On 27/07/2015 04:12, vijay.kilari@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>
>
> Add Domain and vcpu specific ITS initialization
>
> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c | 10 ++++++++++
> xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c | 10 ++++++++++
> xen/arch/arm/vgic.c | 3 +++
> xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h | 2 ++
> xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c
> index 5323192..e182cee 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3-its.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> #define GITS_PIDR4_VAL (0x04)
> #define GITS_BASER_INIT_VAL ((1UL << GITS_BASER_TYPE_SHIFT) | \
> (0x7UL << GITS_BASER_ENTRY_SIZE_SHIFT))
> +//#define DEBUG_ITS
Why here?
> #ifdef DEBUG_ITS
> # define DPRINTK(fmt, args...) dprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, fmt, ##args)
> #else
> @@ -1122,6 +1123,15 @@ int vits_domain_init(struct domain *d)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void vits_domain_free(struct domain *d)
> +{
> + free_xenheap_pages(d->arch.vgic.vits->prop_page,
> + get_order_from_bytes(d->arch.vgic.vits->prop_size));
> + xfree(d->arch.vgic.pending_lpis);
> + xfree(d->arch.vgic.vits->collections);
> + xfree(d->arch.vgic.vits);
For instance, you add the initialization of these fields in patch #8 and
#10 but free everything here. I have to go in the others patch to get if
you forgot something or not.
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Local variables:
> * mode: C
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> index 9e6e3ff..a09ba36 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -1299,12 +1299,22 @@ static int vgic_v3_domain_init(struct domain *d)
>
> d->arch.vgic.ctlr = VGICD_CTLR_DEFAULT;
>
> + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) && gic_lpi_supported() )
I think gic_lpi_supported is badly name. vITS should only be supported
when ITS is present, not when LPIs is present.
And I know that you unset LPIs when ITS is not present. But this confuse
the reader to do this.
> + vits_domain_init(d);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void vgic_v3_domain_free(struct domain *d)
> +{
> + if ( is_hardware_domain(d) && gic_lpi_supported() )
> + vits_domain_free(d);
> +}
> +
> static const struct vgic_ops v3_ops = {
> .vcpu_init = vgic_v3_vcpu_init,
> .domain_init = vgic_v3_domain_init,
> + .domain_free = vgic_v3_domain_free,
> .get_irq_priority = vgic_v3_get_irq_priority,
> .get_target_vcpu = vgic_v3_get_target_vcpu,
> .emulate_sysreg = vgic_v3_emulate_sysreg,
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> index 57c0f52..e2bfdb6 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ void domain_vgic_free(struct domain *d)
> xfree(d->arch.vgic.shared_irqs);
> xfree(d->arch.vgic.pending_irqs);
> xfree(d->arch.vgic.allocated_irqs);
> +
> + if ( !d->arch.vgic.handler->domain_free )
The test is wrong. If domain_free is NULL you will end up to dereference
the pointer and crash.
> + d->arch.vgic.handler->domain_free(d);
> }
>
> int vcpu_vgic_init(struct vcpu *v)
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h
> index 870c9a8..da689a4 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h
> @@ -367,6 +367,8 @@ int its_cpu_init(void);
> void its_set_lpi_properties(struct irq_desc *desc,
> const cpumask_t *cpu_mask,
> unsigned int priority);
> +int vits_domain_init(struct domain *d);
> +void vits_domain_free(struct domain *d);
> int vits_get_vitt_entry(struct domain *d, uint32_t devid,
> uint32_t event, struct vitt *entry);
> int vits_get_vdevice_entry(struct domain *d, uint32_t devid,
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h
> index b11faa0..853df04 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h
> @@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ struct vgic_ops {
> int (*vcpu_init)(struct vcpu *v);
> /* Domain specific initialization of vGIC */
> int (*domain_init)(struct domain *d);
> + /* Free domain specific resources */
> + void (*domain_free)(struct domain *d);
> /* Get priority for a given irq stored in vgic structure */
> int (*get_irq_priority)(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq);
> /* Get the target vcpu for a given virq. The rank lock is already taken
> @@ -191,6 +193,7 @@ enum gic_sgi_mode;
> #define vgic_num_irqs(d) ((d)->arch.vgic.nr_spis + 32)
>
> extern int domain_vgic_init(struct domain *d, unsigned int nr_spis);
> +extern void vgic_its_init(void);
Where does it come from?
> extern void domain_vgic_free(struct domain *d);
> extern int vcpu_vgic_init(struct vcpu *v);
> extern struct vcpu *vgic_get_target_vcpu(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq);
>
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-17 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-27 11:11 [PATCH v5 00/22] Add ITS support vijay.kilari
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] xen/arm: Return success if dt node does not have irq mapping vijay.kilari
2015-07-28 13:13 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-28 13:23 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-28 13:27 ` Julien Grall
2015-09-02 15:25 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] xen/arm: Add bitmap_find_next_zero_area helper function vijay.kilari
2015-08-11 13:53 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] xen: Add log2 functionality vijay.kilari
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] xen/arm: Set nr_cpu_ids to available number of cpus vijay.kilari
2015-07-28 13:21 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] xen/arm: ITS: Port ITS driver to Xen vijay.kilari
2015-07-28 16:46 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-29 15:22 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-07-29 16:06 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-29 16:18 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-07-31 10:28 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-07-31 11:10 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add helper functions to manage its_devices vijay.kilari
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add virtual ITS driver vijay.kilari
2015-07-28 17:13 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 6:49 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-07-31 10:14 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 10:32 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add virtual ITS commands support vijay.kilari
2015-07-28 18:04 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 6:57 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-07-31 10:16 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] xen/arm: ITS: Export ITS info to Virtual ITS vijay.kilari
2015-07-28 18:14 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 7:01 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-08-03 15:58 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add GITS registers emulation vijay.kilari
2015-07-28 19:01 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 7:25 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-07-31 10:28 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-01 8:50 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-08-03 11:19 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] xen/arm: ITS: Enable physical and virtual ITS driver compilation vijay.kilari
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add GICR register emulation vijay.kilari
2015-07-30 17:04 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-31 9:08 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-07-31 11:05 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-01 10:25 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-08-01 15:51 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-03 9:36 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-08-03 13:01 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-03 13:51 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-08-03 13:58 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-04 6:55 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-08-04 8:44 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] xen/arm: ITS: Implement gic_is_lpi helper function vijay.kilari
2015-07-30 17:14 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] xen/arm: ITS: Allocate irq descriptors for LPIs vijay.kilari
2015-08-04 13:21 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] xen/arm: ITS: implement hw_irq_controller " vijay.kilari
2015-08-04 13:45 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-06 8:15 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-08-06 10:05 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-06 10:11 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] xen/arm: ITS: Route LPIs vijay.kilari
2015-08-04 14:54 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:11 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] xen/arm: ITS: Initialize physical ITS vijay.kilari
2015-08-17 19:00 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:12 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add domain specific ITS initialization vijay.kilari
2015-08-17 18:57 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2015-07-27 11:12 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add APIs to add and assign device vijay.kilari
2015-08-17 19:17 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:12 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] xen/arm: ITS: Map ITS translation space vijay.kilari
2015-08-17 19:20 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-18 19:14 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-18 22:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-02 15:45 ` Ian Campbell
2015-09-02 15:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-07-27 11:12 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] xen/arm: ITS: Generate ITS node for Dom0 vijay.kilari
2015-08-17 19:41 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-21 23:02 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-08-21 23:48 ` Julien Grall
2015-08-26 12:40 ` Vijay Kilari
2015-08-27 0:02 ` Julien Grall
2015-07-27 11:12 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] xen/arm: ITS: Add pci devices in ThunderX vijay.kilari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55D22E87.7000909@citrix.com \
--to=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=vijay.kilari@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).