From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: PAGE_SIZE (64KB), while block driver 'struct request' deals with < PAGE_SIZE (up to 44Kb). Was:Re: [RFC] Support of non-indirect grant backend on 64KB guest Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 17:15:13 +0100 Message-ID: <55E9C391.7040601@citrix.com> References: <55D49E1B.4010405@citrix.com> <55D5906C.7070907@citrix.com> <55D5A15C.80206@citrix.com> <20150821160510.GE26663@l.oracle.com> <55D74D03.9020301@citrix.com> <20150821171022.GL26663@l.oracle.com> <55DF4E04.8010005@citrix.com> <20150904154151.GA28256@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150904154151.GA28256@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Stefano Stabellini Cc: axboe@fb.com, Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , David Vrabel , =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/09/15 16:41, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> Maybe we could fall back to the previous plan of modifying xen-blkfront >> for the moment? > > Which afaic need to be reposted? Right. Although I didn't see any comment on the patch. All the comments was about the problem. Does it mean that you and Roger are "happy" with the way it's done? Regards, -- Julien Grall