From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: "wangxin (U)" <wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Fanhenglong <fanhenglong@huawei.com>,
"wei.liu2@citrix.com" <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
"Hanweidong (Randy)" <hanweidong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: failed to save x86 HVM guest with 1TB ram
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 19:50:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F07F89.7040008@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8ADDA2EB7601DA429B6B2A43EF4620A51D934F45@szxeml556-mbs.china.huawei.com>
On 08/09/15 03:28, wangxin (U) wrote:
>
>> The check serves a dual purpose. In the legacy case, it is to avoid
>> clobbering the upper bits of pfn information with pfn type information
>> for 32bit toolstacks; any PFN above 2^28 would have type information
>> clobbering the upper bits. This has been mitigated somewhat in
>> migration v2, as pfns are strictly 64bit values, still using the upper 4
>> bits for type information, allowing 60 bits for the PFN itself.
>>
>> The second purpose is just as a limit on toolstack resources. Migration
>> requires allocating structures which scale linearly with the size of the
>> VM; the biggest of which would be ~1GB for the p2m. Added to this is
>> >1GB for the m2p, and suddenly a 32bit toolstack process is looking
>> scarce on RAM.
>>
>> During the development of migration v2, I didn't spend any time
>> considering if or how much it was sensible to lift the restriction by,
>> so the check was imported wholesale from the legacy code.
>>
>> For now, I am going to say that it simply doesn't work. Simply upping
>> the limit is only a stopgap measure; an HVM guest can still mess this up
> Will the stopgap measure work in xen 4.5?
I don't know - try it.
>
>> by playing physmap games and mapping a page of ram at a really high
>> (guest) physical address. Longterm, we need hypervisor support for
>> getting a compressed view of guest physical address space, so toolstack
>> side resources are proportional to the amount of RAM given to the guest,
>> not to how big a guest decides to make its physmap.
> Is that in your further work?
It is on the list, but no idea if/how it would be done at the moment.
~Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-09 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-07 8:09 BUG: failed to save x86 HVM guest with 1TB ram wangxin (U)
2015-09-07 9:48 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-09-08 2:28 ` wangxin (U)
2015-09-09 18:50 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F07F89.7040008@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=fanhenglong@huawei.com \
--cc=hanweidong@huawei.com \
--cc=wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).