From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/p2m: fix mismatched unlock Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:49:32 +0100 Message-ID: <55F6982C.7090303@citrix.com> References: <55F68FBB02000078000A268C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbQOG-0002XZ-GA for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:49:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: <55F68FBB02000078000A268C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel Cc: George Dunlap , Keir Fraser , Wei Liu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 14/09/15 08:13, Jan Beulich wrote: > Luckily, due to gfn_unlock() currently mapping to p2m_unlock(), this is > only a cosmetic issue right now. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper