From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
jbeulich@suse.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] x86/intel_pstate: add a booting param to select the driver to load
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:08:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FAE585.8020404@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1442197930-3738-8-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com>
On 14/09/15 03:32, Wei Wang wrote:
> By default, the old P-state driver (acpi-freq) is used. Adding
> "intel_pstate" to the Xen booting param list to enable the
> use of intel_pstate. However, if intel_pstate is enabled on a
> machine which does not support the driver (e.g. Nehalem), the
> old P-state driver will be loaded due to the failure loading of
> intel_pstate.
>
> Also, adding the intel_pstate booting parameter to
> xen-command-line.markdown.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown | 7 +++++++
> xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 9 ++++++---
> xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> changes in v5:
> 1) move the booting parameter into the intel_pstate_init() function - have
> it be a local variable;
> 2) rename "intel_pstate_load" to "load".
>
> diff --git a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown
> index a2e427c..2d70137 100644
> --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown
> +++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown
> @@ -849,6 +849,13 @@ debug hypervisor only).
> ### idle\_latency\_factor
> > `= <integer>`
>
> +### intel\_pstate
> +> `= <boolean>`
> +
> +> Default: `false`
> +
> +Enable the loading of the intel pstate driver.
> +
> ### ioapic\_ack
> > `= old | new`
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 8494fa0..7e517b9 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/percpu.h>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <asm/cpufreq.h>
> #include <acpi/acpi.h>
> #include <acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.h>
>
> @@ -647,9 +648,11 @@ static int __init cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> int ret = 0;
>
> if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) &&
> - (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL))
> - ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&acpi_cpufreq_driver);
> - else if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) &&
> + (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)) {
> + ret = intel_pstate_init();
> + if (ret)
> + ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&acpi_cpufreq_driver);
This looks like a mess (although not your fault to start with).
We shouldn't have multiple different top level command line options. In
particular, having "mwait-idle" and "intel_pstate" seems wrong, given a
perfectly good "cpufreq=" option.
Is the driver in use available to change at runtime from `xenpm` ?
> + } else if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) &&
> (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD))
> ret = powernow_register_driver();
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 3292bcd..4ebd9c7 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -843,7 +843,11 @@ int __init intel_pstate_init(void)
> int cpu, rc = 0;
> const struct x86_cpu_id *id;
> struct cpu_defaults *cpu_info;
> + static bool_t __read_mostly load;
__initdata
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-17 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 2:32 [PATCH v5 0/9] Porting the intel_pstate driver to Xen Wei Wang
2015-09-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] x86/intel_pstate: add some calculation related support Wei Wang
2015-09-17 15:19 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-05 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] x86/intel_pstate: APERF/MPERF feature detect Wei Wang
2015-09-17 15:26 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-05 16:14 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] x86/intel_pstate: add a new driver interface, setpolicy() Wei Wang
2015-09-17 15:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-06 15:37 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] x86/intel_pstate: relocate the driver register function Wei Wang
2015-09-17 15:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-09-21 13:13 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-07 15:08 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] x86/intel_pstate: changes in cpufreq_del_cpu for CPU offline Wei Wang
2015-09-17 15:43 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-07 15:28 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-11 2:19 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-09-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] x86/intel_pstate: the main boby of the intel_pstate driver Wei Wang
2015-09-17 15:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-07 15:39 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] x86/intel_pstate: add a booting param to select the driver to load Wei Wang
2015-09-17 16:08 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2015-09-21 13:15 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-07 15:46 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-23 8:09 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-10-23 8:16 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-10-23 8:18 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-10-23 8:35 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-23 8:48 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-09-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] x86/intel_pstate: support the use of intel_pstate in pmstat.c Wei Wang
2015-10-07 16:10 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-26 6:26 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-10-26 7:02 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-26 7:59 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-10-26 9:40 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-26 9:48 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-10-26 9:53 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-26 10:19 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-10-26 10:35 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-26 10:45 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-10-26 10:51 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-26 11:03 ` Wang, Wei W
2015-09-14 2:32 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] tools: enable xenpm to control the intel_pstate driver Wei Wang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-14 2:42 [PATCH v5 7/9] x86/intel_pstate: add a booting param to select the driver to load Wei Wang
2015-09-14 11:17 ` Jan Beulich
2015-09-14 11:35 ` Wang, Wei W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FAE585.8020404@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).