From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/28] xen/arm: ITS: Add helper functions to manage its_devices Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:26:59 +0100 Message-ID: <55FFE983.1080404@citrix.com> References: <1442581755-2668-1-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> <1442581755-2668-7-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1442581755-2668-7-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: vijay.kilari@gmail.com, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, Vijaya Kumar K , manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Vijay, On 18/09/15 14:08, vijay.kilari@gmail.com wrote: > +static void its_remove_device(struct its_device *dev) > +{ > + if ( dev ) > + rb_erase(&dev->node, &rb_its_dev); Either the caller or this function has to take the lock which protect the RB-tree. If it's the caller, please add an ASSERT to check the lock is taken. If not, you know what to do ;). Regards, > +} > + Regards, -- Julien Grall