xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Vijay Kilari <vijay.kilari@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/24] ARM: GICv3: introduce separate pending_irq structs for LPIs
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 19:47:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55a10bdc-b833-d483-1c1c-f5b0d6f8f278@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALicx6vVN6jahpOkDrS81Kh6XAK4FLQytTtwF4o0GW78QTKAiQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On 24/10/16 16:31, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>> For the same reason that allocating a struct irq_desc for each
>> possible LPI is not an option, having a struct pending_irq for each LPI
>> is also not feasible. However we actually only need those when an
>> interrupt is on a vCPU (or is about to be injected).
>> Maintain a list of those structs that we can use for the lifecycle of
>> a guest LPI. We allocate new entries if necessary, however reuse
>> pre-owned entries whenever possible.
>> Teach the existing VGIC functions to find the right pointer when being
>> given a virtual LPI number.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  xen/arch/arm/gic.c            |  3 +++
>>  xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c        |  2 ++
>>  xen/arch/arm/vgic.c           | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h  |  1 +
>>  xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h | 10 ++++++++
>>  xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h    |  9 +++++++
>>  6 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> index 63c744a..ebe4035 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
>> @@ -506,6 +506,9 @@ static void gic_update_one_lr(struct vcpu *v, int i)
>>                  struct vcpu *v_target = vgic_get_target_vcpu(v, irq);
>>                  irq_set_affinity(p->desc, cpumask_of(v_target->processor));
>>              }
>> +            /* If this was an LPI, mark this struct as available again. */
>> +            if ( p->irq >= 8192 )
>  Can define something line is_lpi(irq) and use it everywhere

Yes, that was on my list anyway.

>> +                p->irq = 0;
>>          }
>>      }
>>  }
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
>> index ec038a3..e9b6490 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic-v3.c
>> @@ -1388,6 +1388,8 @@ static int vgic_v3_vcpu_init(struct vcpu *v)
>>      if ( v->vcpu_id == last_cpu || (v->vcpu_id == (d->max_vcpus - 1)) )
>>          v->arch.vgic.flags |= VGIC_V3_RDIST_LAST;
>>
>> +    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&v->arch.vgic.pending_lpi_list);
>> +
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
>> index 0965119..b961551 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vgic.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
>>  #include <asm/mmio.h>
>>  #include <asm/gic.h>
>>  #include <asm/vgic.h>
>> +#include <asm/gic_v3_defs.h>
>> +#include <asm/gic-its.h>
>>
>>  static inline struct vgic_irq_rank *vgic_get_rank(struct vcpu *v, int rank)
>>  {
>> @@ -61,7 +63,7 @@ struct vgic_irq_rank *vgic_rank_irq(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq)
>>      return vgic_get_rank(v, rank);
>>  }
>>
>> -static void vgic_init_pending_irq(struct pending_irq *p, unsigned int virq)
>> +void vgic_init_pending_irq(struct pending_irq *p, unsigned int virq)
>>  {
>>      INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->inflight);
>>      INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->lr_queue);
>> @@ -244,10 +246,14 @@ struct vcpu *vgic_get_target_vcpu(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int virq)
>>
>>  static int vgic_get_virq_priority(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int virq)
>>  {
>> -    struct vgic_irq_rank *rank = vgic_rank_irq(v, virq);
>> +    struct vgic_irq_rank *rank;
>>      unsigned long flags;
>>      int priority;
>>
>> +    if ( virq >= 8192 )
>> +        return gicv3_lpi_get_priority(v->domain, virq);
>> +
>> +    rank = vgic_rank_irq(v, virq);
>>      vgic_lock_rank(v, rank, flags);
>>      priority = rank->priority[virq & INTERRUPT_RANK_MASK];
>>      vgic_unlock_rank(v, rank, flags);
>> @@ -446,13 +452,55 @@ int vgic_to_sgi(struct vcpu *v, register_t sgir, enum gic_sgi_mode irqmode, int
>>      return 1;
>>  }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Holding struct pending_irq's for each possible virtual LPI in each domain
>> + * requires too much Xen memory, also a malicious guest could potentially
>> + * spam Xen with LPI map requests. We cannot cover those with (guest allocated)
>> + * ITS memory, so we use a dynamic scheme of allocating struct pending_irq's
>> + * on demand.
>> + */
>> +struct pending_irq *lpi_to_pending(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int lpi,
>> +                                   bool allocate)
>> +{
>> +    struct lpi_pending_irq *lpi_irq, *empty = NULL;
>> +
>> +    /* TODO: locking! */
>> +    list_for_each_entry(lpi_irq, &v->arch.vgic.pending_lpi_list, entry)
>> +    {
>> +        if ( lpi_irq->pirq.irq == lpi )
>> +            return &lpi_irq->pirq;
>> +
>> +        if ( lpi_irq->pirq.irq == 0 && !empty )
>> +            empty = lpi_irq;
>> +    }
>    With this approach of allocating pending_irq on demand, if the
> pending_lpi_list
> is at n position then it iterates for long time to find pending_irq entry.
> This will increase LPI injection time to domain.
> 
> Why can't we use btree?

That's an optimization. You will find that the actual number of
interrupts on a VCPU at any given time is very low, especially if we
look at LPIs only. So my hunch is that it's either 0, 1 or 2, not more.
So for simplicity I'd keep it as a list for now. If we see issues, we
can amend this at any time.

>> +
>> +    if ( !allocate )
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    if ( !empty )
>> +    {
>> +        empty = xzalloc(struct lpi_pending_irq);
>> +        vgic_init_pending_irq(&empty->pirq, lpi);
>> +        list_add_tail(&empty->entry, &v->arch.vgic.pending_lpi_list);
>> +    } else
>> +    {
>> +        empty->pirq.status = 0;
>> +        empty->pirq.irq = lpi;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return &empty->pirq;
>> +}
>> +
>>  struct pending_irq *irq_to_pending(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq)
>>  {
>>      struct pending_irq *n;
>> +
>>      /* Pending irqs allocation strategy: the first vgic.nr_spis irqs
>>       * are used for SPIs; the rests are used for per cpu irqs */
>>      if ( irq < 32 )
>>          n = &v->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[irq];
>> +    else if ( irq >= 8192 )
>> +        n = lpi_to_pending(v, irq, true);
>>      else
>>          n = &v->domain->arch.vgic.pending_irqs[irq - 32];
>>      return n;
>> @@ -480,7 +528,7 @@ void vgic_clear_pending_irqs(struct vcpu *v)
>>  void vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int virq)
>>  {
>>      uint8_t priority;
>> -    struct pending_irq *iter, *n = irq_to_pending(v, virq);
>> +    struct pending_irq *iter, *n;
>>      unsigned long flags;
>>      bool_t running;
>>
>> @@ -488,6 +536,8 @@ void vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int virq)
>>
>>      spin_lock_irqsave(&v->arch.vgic.lock, flags);
>>
>> +    n = irq_to_pending(v, virq);
>> +
>>      /* vcpu offline */
>>      if ( test_bit(_VPF_down, &v->pause_flags) )
>>      {
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
>> index 9452fcd..ae8a9de 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h
>> @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ struct arch_vcpu
>>          paddr_t rdist_base;
>>  #define VGIC_V3_RDIST_LAST  (1 << 0)        /* last vCPU of the rdist */
>>          uint8_t flags;
>> +        struct list_head pending_lpi_list;
>>      } vgic;
>>
>>      /* Timer registers  */
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h
>> index 4e9841a..1f881c0 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h
>> @@ -136,6 +136,12 @@ int gicv3_lpi_allocate_host_lpi(struct host_its *its,
>>  int gicv3_lpi_drop_host_lpi(struct host_its *its,
>>                              uint32_t devid, uint32_t eventid,
>>                              uint32_t host_lpi);
>> +
>> +static inline int gicv3_lpi_get_priority(struct domain *d, uint32_t lpi)
>> +{
>> +    return GIC_PRI_IRQ;
>    Why lpi priority is fixed?. can't we use domain set lpi priority?

Mmh, looks like a rebase artifact. It is fixed if the ITS isn't
configured, but should just be the prototype if not.
The final file has it right, so I guess this gets amended in some later
patch. Thanks for spotting this.

Cheers,
Andre.

>> +}
>> +
>>  #else
>>
>>  static inline void gicv3_its_dt_init(const struct dt_device_node *node)
>> @@ -175,6 +181,10 @@ static inline int gicv3_lpi_drop_host_lpi(struct host_its *its,
>>  {
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>> +static inline int gicv3_lpi_get_priority(struct domain *d, uint32_t lpi)
>> +{
>> +    return GIC_PRI_IRQ;
>> +}
>>
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_HAS_ITS */
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h
>> index 300f461..4e29ba6 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/vgic.h
>> @@ -83,6 +83,12 @@ struct pending_irq
>>      struct list_head lr_queue;
>>  };
>>
>> +struct lpi_pending_irq
>> +{
>> +    struct list_head entry;
>> +    struct pending_irq pirq;
>> +};
>> +
>>  #define NR_INTERRUPT_PER_RANK   32
>>  #define INTERRUPT_RANK_MASK (NR_INTERRUPT_PER_RANK - 1)
>>
>> @@ -296,8 +302,11 @@ extern struct vcpu *vgic_get_target_vcpu(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int virq);
>>  extern void vgic_vcpu_inject_irq(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int virq);
>>  extern void vgic_vcpu_inject_spi(struct domain *d, unsigned int virq);
>>  extern void vgic_clear_pending_irqs(struct vcpu *v);
>> +extern void vgic_init_pending_irq(struct pending_irq *p, unsigned int virq);
>>  extern struct pending_irq *irq_to_pending(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq);
>>  extern struct pending_irq *spi_to_pending(struct domain *d, unsigned int irq);
>> +extern struct pending_irq *lpi_to_pending(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq,
>> +                                          bool allocate);
>>  extern struct vgic_irq_rank *vgic_rank_offset(struct vcpu *v, int b, int n, int s);
>>  extern struct vgic_irq_rank *vgic_rank_irq(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int irq);
>>  extern int vgic_emulate(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, union hsr hsr);
>> --
>> 2.9.0
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
>> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-03 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 144+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-28 18:24 [RFC PATCH 00/24] [FOR 4.9] arm64: Dom0 ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 01/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: parse and store ITS subnodes from hardware DT Andre Przywara
2016-10-26  1:11   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-01 15:13   ` Julien Grall
2016-11-14 17:35     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-23 15:39       ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 02/24] ARM: GICv3: allocate LPI pending and property table Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 14:28   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-02 16:22     ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-26  1:10   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-10 15:29     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-10 21:00       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-01 17:22   ` Julien Grall
2016-11-15 11:32     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-23 15:58       ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 03/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: allocate device and collection table Andre Przywara
2016-10-09 13:55   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-10-10  9:05     ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 14:30   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-02 17:51     ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-26 22:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-01 17:34     ` Julien Grall
2016-11-10 15:32     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-10 21:06       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-01 18:19   ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 04/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: map ITS command buffer Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 14:31   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-10-26 23:03   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-10 16:04     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-02 13:38   ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 05/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: introduce ITS command handling Andre Przywara
2016-10-26 23:55   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-10-27 21:52     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-10 15:57     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-02 15:05   ` Julien Grall
2017-01-31  9:10     ` Andre Przywara
2017-01-31 10:23       ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 06/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: introduce host LPI array Andre Przywara
2016-10-27 22:59   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-02 15:14     ` Julien Grall
2016-11-10 17:22     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-10 21:48       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 07/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: introduce device mapping Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 15:31   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-03 19:33     ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-28  0:08   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 08/24] ARM: GICv3: introduce separate pending_irq structs for LPIs Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 15:31   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-03 19:47     ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2016-10-28  1:04   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-01-12 19:14     ` Andre Przywara
2017-01-13 19:37       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-01-16  9:44         ` André Przywara
2017-01-16 19:16           ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-04 15:46   ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 09/24] ARM: GICv3: forward pending LPIs to guests Andre Przywara
2016-10-28  1:51   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 10/24] ARM: GICv3: enable ITS and LPIs on the host Andre Przywara
2016-10-28 23:07   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 11/24] ARM: vGICv3: handle virtual LPI pending and property tables Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 15:32   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-03 20:21     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-04 11:53       ` Julien Grall
2016-10-29  0:39   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-29 15:47     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-02 17:18   ` Julien Grall
2016-11-02 17:41     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-02 18:03       ` Julien Grall
2016-11-02 18:09         ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-01-31  9:10     ` Andre Przywara
2017-01-31 10:38       ` Julien Grall
2017-01-31 12:04         ` Andre Przywara
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 12/24] ARM: vGICv3: introduce basic ITS emulation bits Andre Przywara
2016-10-09 14:20   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-10-10 10:38     ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 15:31   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-03 19:26     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-04 12:07       ` Julien Grall
2016-11-03 17:50   ` Julien Grall
2016-11-08 23:54   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 13/24] ARM: vITS: handle CLEAR command Andre Przywara
2016-11-04 15:48   ` Julien Grall
2016-11-09  0:39   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-09 13:32     ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 14/24] ARM: vITS: handle INT command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  0:42   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 15/24] ARM: vITS: handle MAPC command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  0:48   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 16/24] ARM: vITS: handle MAPD command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  0:54   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 17/24] ARM: vITS: handle MAPTI command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  1:07   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 18/24] ARM: vITS: handle MOVI command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  1:13   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 19/24] ARM: vITS: handle DISCARD command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  1:28   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 20/24] ARM: vITS: handle INV command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  1:49   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 21/24] ARM: vITS: handle INVALL command Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 15:32   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-04  9:22     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-10  0:21       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-10 11:57         ` Julien Grall
2016-11-10 20:42           ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-11 15:53             ` Julien Grall
2016-11-11 20:31               ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-18 18:39                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-25 16:10                   ` Julien Grall
2016-12-01  1:19                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-02 16:18                       ` Andre Przywara
2016-12-03  0:46                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-05 13:36                           ` Julien Grall
2016-12-05 19:51                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-06 15:56                               ` Julien Grall
2016-12-06 19:36                                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-06 21:32                                   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-06 21:53                                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-06 22:01                                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-06 22:12                                         ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-06 23:13                                         ` Julien Grall
2016-12-07 20:20                                           ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-09 18:01                                             ` Julien Grall
2016-12-09 20:13                                               ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-09 18:07                                             ` Andre Przywara
2016-12-09 20:18                                               ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-14  2:39                                                 ` George Dunlap
2016-12-16  1:30                                                   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-06 22:39                                       ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-06 23:24                                         ` Julien Grall
2016-12-07  0:17                                           ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-07 20:21                                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-09 10:14                                           ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-06 21:36                               ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-09 19:00                           ` Andre Przywara
2016-12-10  0:30                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-12 10:38                               ` Andre Przywara
2016-12-14  0:38                                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 22/24] ARM: vITS: create and initialize virtual ITSes for Dom0 Andre Przywara
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 23/24] ARM: vITS: create ITS subnodes for Dom0 DT Andre Przywara
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 24/24] ARM: vGIC: advertising LPI support Andre Przywara
2016-11-10  0:49   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-10 11:22     ` Julien Grall
2016-11-02 13:56 ` [RFC PATCH 00/24] [FOR 4.9] arm64: Dom0 ITS emulation Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55a10bdc-b833-d483-1c1c-f5b0d6f8f278@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=vijay.kilari@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).