From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH] VT-d: don't suppress invalidation address write when it is zero Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 17:01:07 +0100 Message-ID: <56096443.2050401@citrix.com> References: <56096BA202000078000A63D2@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Zgars-0004D6-6F for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:01:32 +0000 In-Reply-To: <56096BA202000078000A63D2@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel Cc: Yang Z Zhang , Kevin Tian List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 28/09/15 15:32, Jan Beulich wrote: > GFN zero is a valid address, and hence may need invalidation done for > it just like for any other GFN. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper