xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com,
	stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] libxc: remove allocate member from struct xc_dom_image
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 17:00:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <560E9C29.7020700@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443797242.11707.130.camel@citrix.com>

On 10/02/2015 04:47 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 16:25 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 10/02/2015 03:01 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 07:49 +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> The allocate() callback in struct xc_dom_image is never set. Remove
>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
>>>
>>> This breaks the stubdom build:
>>>
>>> kexec.c: In function ‘kexec’:
>>> kexec.c:221:78: warning: taking address of expression of type ‘void’
>>>        xen_pfn_t boot_page_mfn = virt_to_mfn(&_boot_page);
>>>
>>>          ^
>>> kexec.c:230:8: error: ‘struct xc_dom_image’ has no member named
>>> ‘allocate’
>>>        dom->allocate = kexec_allocate;
>>>           ^
>>> kexec.c:318:60: warning: taking address of expression of type ‘void’
>>>                virt_to_mfn(&_boot_page));
>>>                                                               ^
>>> Makefile:79: recipe for target '/local/scratch/ianc/devel/committer
>>> -amd64.git/stubdom/grub-x86_64/kexec.o' failed
>>>
>>> On i386 too.
>>>
>>> And in fact that hook looks useful in that context, so either it needs
>>> to
>>> stay of stubdom kexec needs changing to work some other way.
>>
>> Too bad.
>>
>> I wanted to remove the allocate callback as it will conflict with the
>> allocations of memory outside the initial default mapping.
>>
>> Just to make sure I understand this correctly:
>>
>> stubdom is used in this context to support grub running as a pv domain
>> capable to start another pv domain.
>
> Correct.
>
>> So as long as stubdom doesn't support mapping the p2m list outside the
>> default mapping it makes no sense to support this feature for any domain
>> started via stubdom/grub (the main reason to use this feature is the
>> support of huge memory causing the p2m list to exceed the available
>> virtual address space of the default mapping).
>
> By "default mapping" you mean the mapping established by the domain builder
> which made the domain, as distinct from any mapping which the guest kernel
> might establish by itself later, right?

Yes.

> I'm not sure that there is any link between the stubdomain's own p2m and
> the default mapping of that and the p2m which it is building for use of the
> domain it is going to kexec and the default mappings of that p2m-to-be from
> the PoV of the to-be-kexec'd guest kernel.

I just checked it again. Initially I thought stubdom would have the same
limitations as Linux regarding the p2m size. But this is not true, as
stubdom's virt_base is 0, while Linux is using ffffffff80000000.

> I'm not sure how kexec operates in this regard.
>
>> So the easy solution would be to not support initrd and p2m outside the
>> default mapping when the allocate callback is set. Do you think this
>> solution is okay?
>
> Irrespective of the above just not supporting this mode would be one way to
> avoid the issue. It would make domains using pvgrub1 have different
> limitations than domains built directly. IOW users will have to trade off
> the security benefits of pvgrub vs the size of the domain they wish to
> build, which is a shame.

Hmm, maybe it's possible to add the support to stubdom. With the limit
of the p2m size not hitting stubdom it might be rather easy. I'll try
it.

> On the other hand pvgrub2 now exists as a separate (out of tree, it's in
> grub.git) thing anyway which doesn't use this domain builder at all AFAIK
> and that's the one I expect people are using going forward anyway.

Hmm, another place where huge domain support is to be added, I guess.


Juergen


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-02 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-02  5:49 [PATCH v2 0/5] libxc: support building large pv-domains Juergen Gross
2015-10-02  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] libxc: remove allocate member from struct xc_dom_image Juergen Gross
2015-10-02 13:01   ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-02 14:25     ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-02 14:47       ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-02 15:00         ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2015-10-02  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] xen: add generic flag to elf_dom_parms indicating support of unmapped initrd Juergen Gross
2015-10-02  9:37   ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-02  9:41     ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-02  9:44     ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-02  9:53       ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-02 10:01         ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-02 10:22           ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-02  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] libxc: create unmapped initrd in domain builder if supported Juergen Gross
2015-10-02 12:59   ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-02 14:46     ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-02 14:56       ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-02 15:13         ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-02 15:21           ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-02 16:28             ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-02  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] libxc: split p2m allocation in domain builder from other magic pages Juergen Gross
2015-10-02  9:29   ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-02  5:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] libxc: create p2m list outside of kernel mapping if supported Juergen Gross
2015-10-02 13:16   ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-02 14:37     ` Juergen Gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=560E9C29.7020700@suse.com \
    --to=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).