From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: RFC: change to 6 months release cycle Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 19:17:30 +0100 Message-ID: <560ECA3A.1030501@citrix.com> References: <20151002174356.GA3577@zion.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Zi4tj-0004tg-AM for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2015 18:17:35 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20151002174356.GA3577@zion.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Lars Kurth List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/10/15 18:43, Wei Liu wrote: > Hi all > > > > Comments are welcome! +1. We have consistently hit certain problems for the past few releases. A 6 month cycle offers a plausible easing of some of the problems, and if the worst comes to the worst we can always decide to move back to a 9 month cycle if 6 causes more problems than expected. ~Andrew