From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>,
Fabio Fantoni <fabio.fantoni@m2r.biz>,
Russell Pavlicek <russell.pavlicek@citrix.com>,
Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: xen devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: Improve or change devel mailing-list for improve efficiency and spending less time, is this possible?
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 11:47:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56124721.408@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444038035.11707.173.camel@citrix.com>
El 05/10/15 a les 11.40, Ian Campbell ha escrit:
> On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 11:32 +0200, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>
> [...]
>
>> It has drawbacks however:
>> [...]
>> - Comments/reviews can only be done using the web interface.
>
> That's a show stopper IMHO.
>
>> - Everyone would have to switch the workflow, I don't know anyway to
>> get it integrated with mailing lists.
>
> This probably is too.
I think so. The FreeBSD community didn't have such a typed review
process before. Some reviews where done in private emails between the
affected parties, some reviews where done in public mailing lists, and
some reviews where done post-commit in the changelog mailing lists.
Switching to Phabricator there also had the nice effect of having a
single place where reviews are done, and developers can do pre-commit
reviews more easily. This is not an issue for Xen, since reviews are
always done pre-commit.
Roger.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-05 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-31 13:46 Improve or change devel mailing-list for improve efficiency and spending less time, is this possible? Fabio Fantoni
2015-08-31 14:16 ` Wei Liu
2015-08-31 17:32 ` Lars Kurth
2015-08-31 19:38 ` Russell Pavlicek
2015-09-30 13:49 ` Fabio Fantoni
2015-09-30 14:02 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-03 19:35 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-05 9:32 ` Roger Pau Monné
2015-10-05 9:40 ` Ian Campbell
2015-10-05 9:47 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56124721.408@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=fabio.fantoni@m2r.biz \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=julien.grall@citrix.com \
--cc=lars.kurth@citrix.com \
--cc=russell.pavlicek@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).