xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	keir@xen.org, jbeulich@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
	dario.faggioli@citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xen: use masking operation instead of test_bit for CSFLAG bits
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:30:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56127B83.3020404@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443760830-29095-3-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com>

On 02/10/15 05:40, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Use a bit mask for testing of a set bit instead of test_bit in case no
> atomic operation is needed, as this will lead to smaller and more
> effective code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>

> ---
>  xen/common/sched_credit2.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c
> index bf1fe6f..912e1a2 100644
> --- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c
> +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c
> @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ __runq_insert(struct list_head *runq, struct csched2_vcpu *svc)
>      /* Idle vcpus not allowed on the runqueue anymore */
>      BUG_ON(is_idle_vcpu(svc->vcpu));
>      BUG_ON(svc->vcpu->is_running);
> -    BUG_ON(test_bit(__CSFLAG_scheduled, &svc->flags));
> +    BUG_ON(svc->flags & CSFLAG_scheduled);
>  
>      list_for_each( iter, runq )
>      {
> @@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ static void
>  __runq_deassign(struct csched2_vcpu *svc)
>  {
>      BUG_ON(__vcpu_on_runq(svc));
> -    BUG_ON(test_bit(__CSFLAG_scheduled, &svc->flags));
> +    BUG_ON(svc->flags & CSFLAG_scheduled);
>  
>      list_del_init(&svc->rqd_elem);
>      update_max_weight(svc->rqd, 0, svc->weight);
> @@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ csched2_vcpu_sleep(const struct scheduler *ops, struct vcpu *vc)
>          update_load(ops, svc->rqd, svc, -1, NOW());
>          __runq_remove(svc);
>      }
> -    else if ( test_bit(__CSFLAG_delayed_runq_add, &svc->flags) )
> +    else if ( svc->flags & CSFLAG_delayed_runq_add )
>          clear_bit(__CSFLAG_delayed_runq_add, &svc->flags);
>  }
>  
> @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ csched2_vcpu_wake(const struct scheduler *ops, struct vcpu *vc)
>      /* If the context hasn't been saved for this vcpu yet, we can't put it on
>       * another runqueue.  Instead, we set a flag so that it will be put on the runqueue
>       * after the context has been saved. */
> -    if ( unlikely (test_bit(__CSFLAG_scheduled, &svc->flags) ) )
> +    if ( unlikely(svc->flags & CSFLAG_scheduled) )
>      {
>          set_bit(__CSFLAG_delayed_runq_add, &svc->flags);
>          goto out;
> @@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ static void migrate(const struct scheduler *ops,
>                      struct csched2_runqueue_data *trqd, 
>                      s_time_t now)
>  {
> -    if ( test_bit(__CSFLAG_scheduled, &svc->flags) )
> +    if ( svc->flags & CSFLAG_scheduled )
>      {
>          d2printk("%pv %d-%d a\n", svc->vcpu, svc->rqd->id, trqd->id);
>          /* It's running; mark it to migrate. */
> @@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ retry:
>          __update_svc_load(ops, push_svc, 0, now);
>  
>          /* Skip this one if it's already been flagged to migrate */
> -        if ( test_bit(__CSFLAG_runq_migrate_request, &push_svc->flags) )
> +        if ( push_svc->flags & CSFLAG_runq_migrate_request )
>              continue;
>  
>          list_for_each( pull_iter, &st.orqd->svc )
> @@ -1361,7 +1361,7 @@ retry:
>              }
>          
>              /* Skip this one if it's already been flagged to migrate */
> -            if ( test_bit(__CSFLAG_runq_migrate_request, &pull_svc->flags) )
> +            if ( pull_svc->flags & CSFLAG_runq_migrate_request )
>                  continue;
>  
>              consider(&st, push_svc, pull_svc);
> @@ -1378,7 +1378,7 @@ retry:
>          struct csched2_vcpu * pull_svc = list_entry(pull_iter, struct csched2_vcpu, rqd_elem);
>          
>          /* Skip this one if it's already been flagged to migrate */
> -        if ( test_bit(__CSFLAG_runq_migrate_request, &pull_svc->flags) )
> +        if ( pull_svc->flags & CSFLAG_runq_migrate_request )
>              continue;
>  
>          /* Consider pull only */
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-05 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-02  4:40 [PATCH 0/5] use mask operations instead of test_bit() Juergen Gross
2015-10-02  4:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] xen: use masking operation instead of test_bit for RTDS bits Juergen Gross
2015-10-02 10:21   ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-05 13:30   ` George Dunlap
2015-10-02  4:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] xen: use masking operation instead of test_bit for CSFLAG bits Juergen Gross
2015-10-02 10:45   ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-05 13:30   ` George Dunlap [this message]
2015-10-02  4:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] xen: use masking operation instead of test_bit for VGCF bits Juergen Gross
2015-10-02  4:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] xen: use masking operation instead of test_bit for VPF bits Juergen Gross
2015-10-05 13:18   ` George Dunlap
2015-10-05 13:36     ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-05 13:45       ` George Dunlap
2015-10-05 14:05         ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-05 14:31           ` George Dunlap
2015-10-05 13:39     ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-05 13:24   ` George Dunlap
2015-10-05 13:40     ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-02  4:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] xen: use masking operation instead of test_bit for MCSF bits Juergen Gross
2015-10-02  9:03 ` [PATCH 0/5] use mask operations instead of test_bit() Dario Faggioli
2015-10-02  9:10   ` Juergen Gross
2015-10-02  9:33     ` Dario Faggioli
2015-10-02  9:44 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-02  9:47 ` Andrew Cooper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56127B83.3020404@citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).