From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] x86/time.c: Scale host TSC in pvclock properly Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:15:17 -0400 Message-ID: <562935C5.40505@oracle.com> References: <1443424438-13404-1-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com> <1443424438-13404-10-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com> <562905BA.9090709@oracle.com> <20151022164401.GG16418@hzzhang-OptiPlex-9020.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151022164401.GG16418@hzzhang-OptiPlex-9020.sh.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Ian Jackson , Stefano Stabellini , Ian Campbell , Wei Liu , Keir Fraser , Jan Beulich , Andrew Cooper , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Aravind Gopalakrishnan , Jun Nakajima , Kevin Tian List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/22/2015 12:44 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:50:18AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 09/28/2015 03:13 AM, Haozhong Zhang wrote: >>> This patch makes the pvclock return the scaled host TSC and >>> corresponding scaling parameters to HVM domains if guest TSC is not >>> emulated and TSC scaling is enabled. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang >>> --- >>> xen/arch/x86/time.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- >>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c >>> index 4b5402c..54eab6e 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c >>> @@ -832,10 +832,19 @@ static void __update_vcpu_system_time(struct vcpu *v, int force) >>> } >>> else >>> { >>> - _u.tsc_timestamp = t->local_tsc_stamp; >>> + if ( is_hvm_domain(d) && hvm_funcs.tsc_scaling_supported ) >>> + { >>> + _u.tsc_timestamp = hvm_scale_tsc(v, t->local_tsc_stamp); >>> + _u.tsc_to_system_mul = d->arch.vtsc_to_ns.mul_frac; >>> + _u.tsc_shift = d->arch.vtsc_to_ns.shift; >>> + } >>> + else >>> + { >>> + _u.tsc_timestamp = t->local_tsc_stamp; >>> + _u.tsc_to_system_mul = t->tsc_scale.mul_frac; >>> + _u.tsc_shift = (s8)t->tsc_scale.shift; >>> + } >>> _u.system_time = t->stime_local_stamp; >>> - _u.tsc_to_system_mul = t->tsc_scale.mul_frac; >>> - _u.tsc_shift = (s8)t->tsc_scale.shift; >>> } >>> if ( is_hvm_domain(d) ) >>> _u.tsc_timestamp += v->arch.hvm_vcpu.cache_tsc_offset; > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > the offset is subtract here Ah, I missed this. Thanks. -boris >> So this is not directly related to this series but when we calculate >> tsc_timestamp --- shouldn't we subtract TSC offset? Otherwise we are >> reporting (possibly scaled) host's TSC and this is supposed to be guest's >> counter. >> >> >> -boris