From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Cc: "wei.liu2@citrix.com" <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@intel.com>,
"jbeulich@suse.com" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com"
<stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
"george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com" <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
"Han, Huaitong" <huaitong.han@intel.com>,
"keir@xen.org" <keir@xen.org>,
"ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com" <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
"ian.campbell@citrix.com" <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [V3 PATCH 7/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, add pkeys support for guest_walk_tables
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:50:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56719647.9010203@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151216162827.GA65025@deinos.phlegethon.org>
On 16/12/15 16:28, Tim Deegan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At 15:36 +0000 on 16 Dec (1450280191), George Dunlap wrote:
>> (hvm_fetch_from_guest_virt() seems to only set PFEC_insn_fetch if nx or
>> smep are enabled in the guest. This seems inconsistent to me with the
>> treatment of PFEC_reserved_bit: it seems like
>> hvm_fetch_from_guest_virt() should always pass in PFEC_insn_fetch,
>> particularly as guest_walk_tables() will already gate the checks based
>> on whether nx or smep is enabled in the guest. Tim, you know of any
>> reason for this?)
>
> This code is following the hardware, IIRC: on real CPUs without NX
> enabled, pagefault error codes will not have that bit set even when
> caused by instruction fetches. Looking at the SDM (3A.4.7) the
> current rules are for that bit to be set iff ((PAE && NXE) || SMEP).
Right, but I think your answer points to the fundamental problem with
the way this code has been written. The pfec value passed to
gva_to_gfn() is used for two separate functions: 1) to tell
guest_walk_tables() what kind of access is happening, so that it can
check the appropriate bits 2) to be used as a pfec value to pass back to
the guest when delivering a page fault.
These two functions should be clearly separated, but right now they're
not: hvm_fetch_from_guest_virt() is "pre-clearing" PFEC_insn_fetch, so
that guest_walk_tables() doesn't even know that an instruction fetch is
happening; as such, it's likely that the pkey code in this series will
DTWT (fault on an instruction fetch) if pkeys are enabled but nx and
smep are not.
Really those should be two separate parameters, one in and one out; and
it should be gva_to_gfn()'s job to translate the missing bits from
guest_walk_tables() into a pfec value suitable to use when injecting a
fault. (Or potentially guest_walk_tables()'s job.)
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-07 9:16 [V3 PATCH 0/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, add memory protection-key support Huaitong Han
2015-12-07 9:16 ` [V3 PATCH 1/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, add the flag to enable Memory Protection Keys Huaitong Han
2015-12-10 15:37 ` George Dunlap
2015-12-07 9:16 ` [V3 PATCH 2/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, add pkeys support when setting CR4 Huaitong Han
2015-12-07 9:16 ` [V3 PATCH 3/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, disable pkeys for guests in non-paging mode Huaitong Han
2015-12-07 9:16 ` [V3 PATCH 4/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, add functions to get pkeys value from PTE Huaitong Han
2015-12-10 15:48 ` George Dunlap
2015-12-10 18:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-07 9:16 ` [V3 PATCH 5/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, add functions to support PKRU access Huaitong Han
2015-12-10 18:48 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-07 9:16 ` [V3 PATCH 6/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, add xstate support for pkeys Huaitong Han
2015-12-10 17:39 ` George Dunlap
2015-12-10 18:57 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-11 9:36 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-07 9:16 ` [V3 PATCH 7/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, add pkeys support for guest_walk_tables Huaitong Han
2015-12-10 18:19 ` George Dunlap
2015-12-11 9:16 ` Wu, Feng
2015-12-11 9:23 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-16 15:36 ` George Dunlap
2015-12-16 16:28 ` Tim Deegan
2015-12-16 16:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-16 17:33 ` Tim Deegan
2015-12-16 16:50 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2015-12-16 17:21 ` Tim Deegan
2015-12-18 8:21 ` Han, Huaitong
2015-12-18 10:03 ` George Dunlap
2015-12-18 11:46 ` Tim Deegan
2015-12-11 9:23 ` Han, Huaitong
2015-12-11 9:50 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-11 9:26 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-15 8:14 ` Han, Huaitong
2015-12-15 9:02 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-16 8:16 ` Han, Huaitong
2015-12-16 8:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-16 9:03 ` Han, Huaitong
2015-12-16 9:12 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-17 9:18 ` Han, Huaitong
2015-12-17 10:05 ` Jan Beulich
2015-12-10 18:59 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-11 7:18 ` Han, Huaitong
2015-12-11 8:48 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-12-07 9:16 ` [V3 PATCH 8/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, add pkeys support for gva2gfn funcitons Huaitong Han
2015-12-07 9:16 ` [V3 PATCH 9/9] x86/hvm: pkeys, add pkeys support for cpuid handling Huaitong Han
2015-12-11 9:47 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56719647.9010203@citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
--cc=feng.wu@intel.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=huaitong.han@intel.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).