From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/13] x86/time.c: Use correct guest TSC frequency in tsc_get_info() Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:48:24 -0500 Message-ID: <568AB068.1070409@oracle.com> References: <1451531020-29964-1-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com> <1451531020-29964-3-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1451531020-29964-3-git-send-email-haozhong.zhang@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Haozhong Zhang , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jan Beulich , Kevin Tian Cc: Jun Nakajima , Andrew Cooper , Keir Fraser , Aravind Gopalakrishnan , Suravee Suthikulpanit List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/30/2015 10:03 PM, Haozhong Zhang wrote: > When the TSC mode of a HVM container is TSC_MODE_DEFAULT or > TSC_MODE_PVRDTSCP and no TSC emulation is used, the existing > tsc_get_info() uses the host TSC frequency (cpu_khz) as the guest TSC > frequency. However, tsc_set_info() may set the guest TSC frequency to a > value different than the host. In order to keep consistent to > tsc_set_info(), this patch makes tsc_get_info() use the value set by > tsc_set_info() as the guest TSC frequency. > > Signed-off-by: Haozhong Zhang > --- > Changes in v3: > (addressing Boris Ostrovsky's comments) > * Use this_cpu(cpu_time).tsc_scale for both scaling and non-scaling cases. > > xen/arch/x86/time.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c > index 0059b6a..d83f068 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c > @@ -1749,6 +1749,9 @@ void tsc_get_info(struct domain *d, uint32_t *tsc_mode, > uint64_t *elapsed_nsec, uint32_t *gtsc_khz, > uint32_t *incarnation) > { > + bool_t enable_tsc_scaling = has_hvm_container_domain(d) && > + cpu_has_tsc_ratio; > + Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky although I still think that having !d->arch.vtsc would be better, even if not strictly required. > *incarnation = d->arch.incarnation; > *tsc_mode = d->arch.tsc_mode; > > @@ -1769,7 +1772,7 @@ void tsc_get_info(struct domain *d, uint32_t *tsc_mode, > } > tsc = rdtsc(); > *elapsed_nsec = scale_delta(tsc, &d->arch.vtsc_to_ns); > - *gtsc_khz = cpu_khz; > + *gtsc_khz = enable_tsc_scaling ? d->arch.tsc_khz : cpu_khz; > break; > case TSC_MODE_PVRDTSCP: > if ( d->arch.vtsc ) > @@ -1780,9 +1783,9 @@ void tsc_get_info(struct domain *d, uint32_t *tsc_mode, > else > { > tsc = rdtsc(); > - *elapsed_nsec = scale_delta(tsc, &d->arch.vtsc_to_ns) - > + *elapsed_nsec = scale_delta(tsc, &this_cpu(cpu_time).tsc_scale) - > d->arch.vtsc_offset; > - *gtsc_khz = 0; /* ignored by tsc_set_info */ > + *gtsc_khz = enable_tsc_scaling ? d->arch.tsc_khz : 0; > } > break; > }