From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
ian.campbell@citrix.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com
Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, roger.pau@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.2] libxc: Defer initialization of start_page for HVM guests
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 15:30:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568FC80D.5020200@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <568FC56F.3050209@oracle.com>
On 08/01/16 15:19, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/07/2016 11:57 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 07/01/16 23:19, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> With commit 8c45adec18e0 ("libxc: create unmapped initrd in domain
>>> builder if supported") location of ramdisk may not be available to
>>> HVMlite guests by the time alloc_magic_pages_hvm() is invoked if the
>>> guest supports unmapped initrd.
>>>
>>> So let's move ramdisk info initialization (along with a few other
>>> operations that are not directly related to allocating magic/special
>>> pages) from alloc_magic_pages_hvm() to bootlate_hvm().
>>>
>>> Since we now split allocation and mapping of the start_info segment
>>> let's stash it, along with cmdline length, in xc_dom_image so that we
>>> can check whether we are mapping correctly-sized range.
>>>
>>> We can also stop using xc_dom_image.start_info_pfn and leave it for
>>> PV(H) guests only.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> v4:
>>> * See the last two paragraphs from commit message above
>>>
>>> v4.1:
>>> * Inverted testing of start_info_size in bootlate_hvm().
>>>
>>> v4.2
>>> * <facepalm> Actually do what I said I'd do in 4.1
>>>
>>> tools/libxc/include/xc_dom.h | 2 +
>>> tools/libxc/xc_dom_x86.c | 140
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xc_dom.h b/tools/libxc/include/xc_dom.h
>>> index 2460818..cac4698 100644
>>> --- a/tools/libxc/include/xc_dom.h
>>> +++ b/tools/libxc/include/xc_dom.h
>>> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct xc_dom_image {
>>> /* arguments and parameters */
>>> char *cmdline;
>>> + size_t cmdline_size;
>>> uint32_t f_requested[XENFEAT_NR_SUBMAPS];
>>> /* info from (elf) kernel image */
>>> @@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ struct xc_dom_image {
>>> struct xc_dom_seg p2m_seg;
>>> struct xc_dom_seg pgtables_seg;
>>> struct xc_dom_seg devicetree_seg;
>>> + struct xc_dom_seg start_info_seg; /* HVMlite only */
>> Instead of adding HVM specific members here, you could make use of
>> dom.arch_private and use just a local structure defined in xc_dom_x86.c.
>
> I did consider this but since we already keep type-specific segments in
> this structure (e.g. p2m_seg) decided to add an explicit segment for
> HVMlite.
But p2m_seg is accessed from multiple sources, while cmdline_size and
start_info_seg would be local to xc_dom_x86.c
BTW: thanks for the hint - I'll have a look whether p2m_seg can't be
moved to arch_private...
> Besides, I think to properly use it we'd need to add an arch hook and
> IMHO it's not worth the trouble in this case.
Why would you need another arch hook? Just add the arch_private_size
member to struct xc_dom_arch and everything is set up for you. Look
how it is handled for the pv case in xc_dom_x86.c
Juergen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-08 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-07 22:19 [PATCH v4.2] libxc: Defer initialization of start_page for HVM guests Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-08 4:57 ` Juergen Gross
2016-01-08 14:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-08 14:30 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
2016-01-08 14:53 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-08 15:11 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-08 15:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-08 15:24 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-19 15:02 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-01-19 15:13 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-19 16:48 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-08 14:31 ` Ian Campbell
2016-01-08 9:58 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568FC80D.5020200@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).