From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/HVM: don't setup an intercept handler for IO port 0xcf8 unconditionally
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:35:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56975DC7.3070905@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8122e183a2d14f759d983acf2777be06@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net>
El 13/01/16 a les 17.48, Paul Durrant ha escrit:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com]
>> Sent: 13 January 2016 16:39
>> To: Paul Durrant; Roger Pau Monne
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/HVM: don't setup an intercept handler for IO
>> port 0xcf8 unconditionally
>>
>>>>> On 13.01.16 at 13:32, <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> Only intercept accesses to IO port 0xcf8 if there's at least one IOREQ
>>> server, otherwise it makes no sense since the only code that uses the value
>>> stored by hvm_access_cf8 is the IOREQ server.
>>
>> Afaict an ioreq server could also attach subsequently - Paul?
>>
>
> Indeed, ioreq servers can come and go at any time.
Right, then I will have to prevent hvm_access_cf8 from being added if
the domain is the hardware domain, otherwise it overlaps with the Dom0
passthrough intercept (handle_pvh_io).
Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-14 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 12:32 [PATCH 0/5] HVMlite: minor fixes and Dom0 preparatory patches Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-13 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] xen/elfnotes: initialise phys_entry to UNSET_ADDR32 Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-13 12:46 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-13 12:52 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-13 13:02 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-13 13:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-13 13:08 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-13 13:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-13 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] libelf: rewrite symtab/strtab loading for Dom0 Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-13 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/hvm: don't set the BSP as initialised in hvm_vcpu_initialise Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-13 16:29 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-13 17:23 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-14 9:07 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-13 12:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86/PV: remove the emulated PIT Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-13 16:36 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-14 8:25 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-14 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-14 10:59 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-14 12:38 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-14 14:03 ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-01-14 14:36 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-13 12:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86/HVM: don't setup an intercept handler for IO port 0xcf8 unconditionally Roger Pau Monne
2016-01-13 16:38 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-13 16:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-13 16:48 ` Paul Durrant
2016-01-14 8:35 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2016-01-14 9:12 ` Jan Beulich
2016-01-14 10:50 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-01-14 11:00 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56975DC7.3070905@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).